IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0190610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of absolute risk of acute graft-versus-host disease following hematopoietic cell transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Lee
  • Sebastien Haneuse
  • Hai-Lin Wang
  • Sherri Rose
  • Stephen R Spellman
  • Michael Verneris
  • Katharine C Hsu
  • Katharina Fleischhauer
  • Stephanie J Lee
  • Reza Abdi

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the treatment of choice for a variety of hematologic malignancies and disorders. Unfortunately, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a frequent complication of HCT. While substantial research has identified clinical, genetic and proteomic risk factors for acute GVHD, few studies have sought to develop risk prediction tools that quantify absolute risk. Such tools would be useful for: optimizing donor selection; guiding GVHD prophylaxis, post-transplant treatment and monitoring strategies; and, recruitment of patients into clinical trials. Using data on 9,651 patients who underwent first allogeneic HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor HCT between 01/1999-12/2011 for treatment of a hematologic malignancy, we developed and evaluated a suite of risk prediction tools for: (i) acute GVHD within 100 days post-transplant and (ii) a composite endpoint of acute GVHD or death within 100 days post-transplant. We considered two sets of inputs: (i) clinical factors that are typically readily-available, included as main effects; and, (ii) main effects combined with a selection of a priori specified two-way interactions. To build the prediction tools we used the super learner, a recently developed ensemble learning statistical framework that combines results from multiple other algorithms/methods to construct a single, optimal prediction tool. Across the final super learner prediction tools, the area-under-the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.613–0.640. Improving the performance of risk prediction tools will likely require extension beyond clinical factors to include biological variables such as genetic and proteomic biomarkers, although the measurement of these factors may currently not be practical in standard clinical settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Lee & Sebastien Haneuse & Hai-Lin Wang & Sherri Rose & Stephen R Spellman & Michael Verneris & Katharine C Hsu & Katharina Fleischhauer & Stephanie J Lee & Reza Abdi, 2018. "Prediction of absolute risk of acute graft-versus-host disease following hematopoietic cell transplantation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190610
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190610
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190610&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0190610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuki Goshima & Shinji Nakaoka & Kazuteru Ohashi & Hisashi Sakamaki & Kazuko Shibuya & Akira Shibuya, 2020. "A mathematical model for dynamics of soluble form of DNAM-1 as a biomarker for graft-versus-host disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Alexander Engels & Katrin C Reber & Ivonne Lindlbauer & Kilian Rapp & Gisela Büchele & Jochen Klenk & Andreas Meid & Clemens Becker & Hans-Helmut König, 2020. "Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data – A machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.