IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0190277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition probabilities between changing sensitization levels, waitlist activity status and competing-risk kidney transplant outcomes using multi-state modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay Kulkarni
  • Isaac Hall
  • Richard Formica
  • Carrie Thiessen
  • Darren Stewart
  • Geliang Gan
  • Erich Greene
  • Yanhong Deng

Abstract

Background: Sensitization and activity status are associated with kidney transplant waitlist mortality. Unknown is how changes in these covariates after listing impact transplant outcomes. Methods: Two cohorts were created from the OPTN (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network) database, one pre-KAS (new kidney allocation system) (10/01/2009-12/04/2013, n = 97,793) and one post-KAS (12/04/2014-06/17/2015, n = 13,113). Multi-state modeling provides transition probabilities between intermediate states (CPRA category/activity status combinations) and competing-risk outcomes: transplant (living), transplant (deceased), death, or other/well. Results: Transition probabilities show chances of converting between intermediate states prior to a competing-risk outcome. One year transplant probabilities for post-KAS candidates with a CPRA of 0%(P, 0.123[95% CI, 0.117,0.129]), 1–79%(P, 0.125 [95% CI, 0.112,0.139]), 95–98%(P, 0.242[95% CI, 0.188, 0.295]) and 99–100%(P, 0.252 [95% CI, 0.195, 0.308]) were significantly higher than the pre-KAS cohort; they were lower for CPRA 80–89%(P, 0.152 [95% CI, 0.116,0.189]) and not statistically different for CPRA 90–94%(P, 0.180 [95% CI, 0.137,0.223]) candidates. Post-KAS, Whites had a statistically higher transplant probability only at a CPRA of 99–100%. Conclusion: Multi-state modeling provides transition probabilities between CPRA/activity status combinations, giving estimates on how changing patient characteristic’s after listing impact outcomes. Preliminarily, across most CPRA categories, there was no statistical difference in transplant probabilities between Whites, Blacks and Hispanics following KAS implementation, however, this finding requires longer follow-up for validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay Kulkarni & Isaac Hall & Richard Formica & Carrie Thiessen & Darren Stewart & Geliang Gan & Erich Greene & Yanhong Deng, 2017. "Transition probabilities between changing sensitization levels, waitlist activity status and competing-risk kidney transplant outcomes using multi-state modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190277
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190277
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190277&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0190277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.