IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0188196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the reproducibility of functional connectivity alterations in Parkinson’s disease

Author

Listed:
  • Liviu Badea
  • Mihaela Onu
  • Tao Wu
  • Adina Roceanu
  • Ovidiu Bajenaru

Abstract

Since anatomic MRI is presently not able to directly discern neuronal loss in Parkinson’s Disease (PD), studying the associated functional connectivity (FC) changes seems a promising approach toward developing non-invasive and non-radioactive neuroimaging markers for this disease. While several groups have reported such FC changes in PD, there are also significant discrepancies between studies. Investigating the reproducibility of PD-related FC changes on independent datasets is therefore of crucial importance. We acquired resting-state fMRI scans for 43 subjects (27 patients and 16 normal controls, with 2 replicate scans per subject) and compared the observed FC changes with those obtained in two independent datasets, one made available by the PPMI consortium (91 patients, 18 controls) and a second one by the group of Tao Wu (20 patients, 20 controls). Unfortunately, PD-related functional connectivity changes turned out to be non-reproducible across datasets. This could be due to disease heterogeneity, but also to technical differences. To distinguish between the two, we devised a method to directly check for disease heterogeneity using random splits of a single dataset. Since we still observe non-reproducibility in a large fraction of random splits of the same dataset, we conclude that functional heterogeneity may be a dominating factor behind the lack of reproducibility of FC alterations in different rs-fMRI studies of PD. While global PD-related functional connectivity changes were non-reproducible across datasets, we identified a few individual brain region pairs with marginally consistent FC changes across all three datasets. However, training classifiers on each one of the three datasets to discriminate PD scans from controls produced only low accuracies on the remaining two test datasets. Moreover, classifiers trained and tested on random splits of the same dataset (which are technically homogeneous) also had low test accuracies, directly substantiating disease heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Liviu Badea & Mihaela Onu & Tao Wu & Adina Roceanu & Ovidiu Bajenaru, 2017. "Exploring the reproducibility of functional connectivity alterations in Parkinson’s disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188196
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188196
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188196&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0188196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan Long & Jinwei Wang & Min Xuan & Quanquan Gu & Xiaojun Xu & Dexing Kong & Minming Zhang, 2012. "Automatic Classification of Early Parkinson's Disease with Multi-Modal MR Imaging," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naif Alsharabi & Tayyaba Shahwar & Ateeq Ur Rehman & Yasser Alharbi, 2023. "Implementing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Disorder Classification via AlexNet–Quantum Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.