IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0182123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine patch therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s dementia associated with minimal and moderate ischemic white matter hyperintensities: A multicenter prospective open-label clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Kyung Won Park
  • Eun-Joo Kim
  • Hyun Jeong Han
  • Yong S Shim
  • Jae C Kwon
  • Bon D Ku
  • Kee Hyung Park
  • Hyon-Ah Yi
  • Kwang K Kim
  • Dong Won Yang
  • Ho-Won Lee
  • Heeyoung Kang
  • Oh Dae Kwon
  • SangYun Kim
  • Jae-Hyeok Lee
  • Eun Joo Chung
  • Sang-Won Park
  • Mee Young Park
  • Bora Yoon
  • Byeong C Kim
  • Sang Won Seo
  • Seong Hye Choi

Abstract

Background and objective: Studies investigating the impact of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on the response of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have presented inconsistent results. We aimed to compare the effects of the rivastigmine patch between patients with AD with minimal WMHs and those with moderate WMHs. Methods: Three hundred patients with mild to moderate AD were enrolled in this multicenter prospective open-label study and divided into two groups. Group 1 comprised patients with AD with minimal WMHs and group 2 comprised those with moderate WMHs. The patients were treated with a rivastigmine patch for 24 weeks. Efficacy measures were obtained at baseline and after 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) from the baseline to the end of the study. Results: Of the 300 patients, there were 206 patients in group 1 and 94 patients in group 2. The intention-to-treat group comprised 198 patients (group 1, n = 136; group 2, n = 46) during the 24-week study period. Demographic factors did not differ between group 1 and group 2. There were no significant differences in change in ADAS-cog between group 1 (-0.62±5.70) and group 2 (-0.23±5.98) after the 24-week rivastigmine patch therapy (p = 0.378). The patients in group 1 had a 0.63-point improvement from baseline on the Frontal Assessment Battery, while group 2 had a 0.16-point decline compared to baseline at the end of the study (p = 0.037). The rates of adverse events (AEs) (42.6 vs. 40.3%) and discontinuation due to AEs (10.3% vs. 4.3%) did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Although the efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine patch therapy were not associated with WMH severity in patients with AD, some improvement in frontal function was observed in those with minimal WMHs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01380288

Suggested Citation

  • Kyung Won Park & Eun-Joo Kim & Hyun Jeong Han & Yong S Shim & Jae C Kwon & Bon D Ku & Kee Hyung Park & Hyon-Ah Yi & Kwang K Kim & Dong Won Yang & Ho-Won Lee & Heeyoung Kang & Oh Dae Kwon & SangYun Kim, 2017. "Efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine patch therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s dementia associated with minimal and moderate ischemic white matter hyperintensities: A multicente," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0182123
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182123
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182123&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0182123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0182123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.