IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0181232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-analyses of the association of G6PC2 allele variants with elevated fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanyuan Shi
  • Yuqian Li
  • Jinjin Wang
  • Chongjian Wang
  • Jingjing Fan
  • Jingzhi Zhao
  • Lei Yin
  • Xuejiao Liu
  • Dongdong Zhang
  • Linlin Li

Abstract

Objective: To collectively evaluate the association of glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic unit 2 (G6PC2) allele variants with elevated fasting glucose (FG) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Design: Meta-analysis Data sources: PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Embase databases. Study selection: Full text articles of studies that identified an association of G6PC2 with T2D and elevated FG. Patient involvement: There was no T2D patient involvement in the analyses on the association of FG with G6PC2, there were T2D patients and non-diabetes patient involvement in the analyses on the association of T2D with G6PC2. Statistical analysis: Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate the pool effect sizes. I2 metric and H2 tests were used to calculate the heterogeneity. Begg's funnel plot and Egger’s linear regression test were done to assess publication bias. Results: Of the 423 studies identified, 21 were eligible and included. Data on three loci (rs560887, rs16856187 and rs573225) were available. The G allele at rs560887 in three ethnicities, the C allele at rs16856187 and the A allele at rs573225 all had a positive association with elevated FG. Per increment of G allele at rs560887 and A allele at rs573225 resulted in a FG 0.070 mmol/l and 0.075 mmol/l higher (ß (95% CI) = 0.070 (0.060, 0.079), p = 4.635e-50 and 0.075 (0.065, 0.085), p = 5.856e-48, respectively). With regard to the relationship of rs16856187 and FG, an increase of 0.152 (95% CI: 0.034–0.270; p = 0.011) and 0.317 (95% CI: 0.193–0.442, p = 6.046e-07) was found in the standardized mean difference (SMD) of FG for the AC and CC genotypes, respectively, when compared with the AA reference genotype. However, the G-allele of rs560887 in Caucasians under the additive model and the C-allele of rs16856187 under the allele and dominant models were associated with a decreased risk of T2D (OR (95% CI) = 0.964 (0.947, 0.981), p = 0.570e-4; OR (95% CI) = 0.892 (0.832, 0.956), p = 0.001; and OR (95% CI) = 0.923(0.892, 0.955), p = 5.301e-6, respectively). Conclusions: Our meta-analyses demonstrate that all three allele variants of G6PC2 (rs560887, rs16856187 and rs573225) are associated with elevated FG, with two variants (rs560887 in the Caucasians subgroup and rs16856187 under the allele and dominant model) being associated with T2D as well. Further studies utilizing larger sample sizes and different ethnic populations are needed to extend and confirm these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanyuan Shi & Yuqian Li & Jinjin Wang & Chongjian Wang & Jingjing Fan & Jingzhi Zhao & Lei Yin & Xuejiao Liu & Dongdong Zhang & Linlin Li, 2017. "Meta-analyses of the association of G6PC2 allele variants with elevated fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0181232
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0181232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0181232&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0181232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0181232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.