Author
Listed:
- Timothy J P Bray
- Saurabh Singh
- Arash Latifoltojar
- Kannan Rajesparan
- Farzana Rahman
- Priya Narayanan
- Sahar Naaseri
- Andre Lopes
- Alan Bainbridge
- Shonit Punwani
- Margaret A Hall-Craggs
Abstract
Objective: To determine which of four Dixon image types [in-phase (IP), out-of-phase (OP), fat only (FO) and water-only (WO)] is most sensitive for detecting multiple myeloma (MM) focal lesions on whole body MRI (WB-MRI) images. Methods: Thirty patients with clinically-suspected MM underwent WB-MRI at 3 Tesla. Unenhanced IP, OP, FO and WO Dixon images were generated and read by four radiologists. On each image type, each radiologist identified and labelled all visible myeloma lesions in the bony pelvis. Each identified lesion was compared with a reference standard consisting of pre- and post-contrast Dixon and diffusion weighted imaging (read by a further consultant radiologist) to determine whether the lesion was truly positive. Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were compared across the four Dixon image types. Results: Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity and confidence scores were all significantly higher on FO images than on IP images (p>0.05). Discussion: FO images are more sensitive than other Dixon image types for MM focal lesions, and should be preferentially read by radiologists to improve diagnostic accuracy and reporting efficiency.
Suggested Citation
Timothy J P Bray & Saurabh Singh & Arash Latifoltojar & Kannan Rajesparan & Farzana Rahman & Priya Narayanan & Sahar Naaseri & Andre Lopes & Alan Bainbridge & Shonit Punwani & Margaret A Hall-Craggs, 2017.
"Diagnostic utility of whole body Dixon MRI in multiple myeloma: A multi-reader study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0180562
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180562
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0180562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.