IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0179521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Webster
  • Derek Groskreutz
  • Anna Grinbergs-Saull
  • Rob Howard
  • John T O’Brien
  • Gail Mountain
  • Sube Banerjee
  • Bob Woods
  • Robert Perneczky
  • Louise Lafortune
  • Charlotte Roberts
  • Jenny McCleery
  • James Pickett
  • Frances Bunn
  • David Challis
  • Georgina Charlesworth
  • Katie Featherstone
  • Chris Fox
  • Claire Goodman
  • Roy Jones
  • Sarah Lamb
  • Esme Moniz-Cook
  • Justine Schneider
  • Sasha Shepperd
  • Claire Surr
  • Jo Thompson-Coon
  • Clive Ballard
  • Carol Brayne
  • Alistair Burns
  • Linda Clare
  • Peter Garrard
  • Patrick Kehoe
  • Peter Passmore
  • Clive Holmes
  • Ian Maidment
  • Louise Robinson
  • Gill Livingston

Abstract

Background: There are no disease-modifying treatments for dementia. There is also no consensus on disease modifying outcomes. We aimed to produce the first evidence-based consensus on core outcome measures for trials of disease modification in mild-to-moderate dementia. Methods and findings: We defined disease-modification interventions as those aiming to change the underlying pathology. We systematically searched electronic databases and previous systematic reviews for published and ongoing trials of disease-modifying treatments in mild-to-moderate dementia. We included 149/22,918 of the references found; with 81 outcome measures from 125 trials. Trials involved participants with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) alone (n = 111), or AD and mild cognitive impairment (n = 8) and three vascular dementia. We divided outcomes by the domain measured (cognition, activities of daily living, biological markers, neuropsychiatric symptoms, quality of life, global). We calculated the number of trials and of participants using each outcome. We detailed psychometric properties of each outcome. We sought the views of people living with dementia and family carers in three cities through Alzheimer’s society focus groups. Attendees at a consensus conference (experts in dementia research, disease-modification and harmonisation measures) decided on the core set of outcomes using these results. Recommended core outcomes were cognition as the fundamental deficit in dementia and to indicate disease modification, serial structural MRIs. Cognition should be measured by Mini Mental State Examination or Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale. MRIs would be optional for patients. We also made recommendations for measuring important, but non-core domains which may not change despite disease modification. Limitations: Most trials were about AD. Specific instruments may be superseded. We searched one database for psychometric properties. Interpretation: This is the first review to identify the 81 outcome measures the research community uses for disease-modifying trials in mild-to-moderate dementia. Our recommendations will facilitate designing, comparing and meta-analysing disease modification trials in mild-to-moderate dementia, increasing their value. Trial registration: PROSPERO no. CRD42015027346.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Webster & Derek Groskreutz & Anna Grinbergs-Saull & Rob Howard & John T O’Brien & Gail Mountain & Sube Banerjee & Bob Woods & Robert Perneczky & Louise Lafortune & Charlotte Roberts & Jenny McCle, 2017. "Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0179521
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179521
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179521&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0179521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0179521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.