IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0179511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The prevalence and correlates of low sexual functioning in women on hemodialysis: A multinational, cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Valeria Saglimbene
  • Patrizia Natale
  • Suetonia Palmer
  • Marco Scardapane
  • Jonathan C Craig
  • Marinella Ruospo
  • Letizia Gargano
  • Giuseppe Lucisano
  • Marietta Török
  • Eduardo Celia
  • Rubén Gelfman
  • Anna Bednarek-Skublewska
  • Jan Dulawa
  • Paul Stroumza
  • Miguel Leal
  • Domingo Del Castillo
  • Angelo Marco Murgo
  • Staffan Schon
  • Charlotta Wollheim
  • Jörgen Hegbrant
  • Giovanni F M Strippoli

Abstract

Sexual dysfunction may affect 80% of women in hemodialysis. However the specific patterns and clinical correlates of sexual functioning remain poorly described. The aim of this study was to assess prevalence and correlates of the individual domains of sexual functioning in women treated with hemodialysis. We recruited, into this multinational cross-sectional study, women treated with long-term hemodialysis (Collaborative Working Group on Depression and Sexual dysfunction in Hemodialysis study). Self-reported domains of sexual functioning were assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index, which is routinely administered within the network of dialysis patients followed by the working group. Lower scores represented lower sexual functioning. Socio-demographic and clinical correlates of each domain of sexual functioning were identified by stepwise multivariable linear regression. Sensitivity analyses were restricted to women who reported being sexually active. We found that of 1309 enrolled women, 659 (50.3%) provided complete responses to FSFI survey questions and 232 (35%) reported being sexually active. Overall, most respondents reported either no sexual activity or low sexual functioning in all measured domains (orgasm 75.1%; arousal 64.0%; lubrication 63.3%; pain 60.7%; satisfaction 60.1%; sexual desire 58.0%). Respondents who were waitlisted for a kidney transplant reported scores with higher sexual functioning, while older respondents reported scores with lower functioning. The presence of depression was associated with worse lubrication and pain scores [mean difference for depressed versus non-depressed women (95% CI) -0.42 (-0.73 to -0.11), -0.53 (-0.89 to -0.16), respectively] while women who had experienced a previous cardiovascular event reported higher pain scores [-0.77 (-1.40- to -0.13)]. In conclusion, women in hemodialysis reported scores consistent with marked low sexual functioning across a range of domains; the low functioning appeared to be associated with comorbidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeria Saglimbene & Patrizia Natale & Suetonia Palmer & Marco Scardapane & Jonathan C Craig & Marinella Ruospo & Letizia Gargano & Giuseppe Lucisano & Marietta Török & Eduardo Celia & Rubén Gelfman &, 2017. "The prevalence and correlates of low sexual functioning in women on hemodialysis: A multinational, cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0179511
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179511
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179511&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0179511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0179511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.