IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0178217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated prediction of emphysema visual score using homology-based quantification of low-attenuation lung region

Author

Listed:
  • Mizuho Nishio
  • Kazuaki Nakane
  • Takeshi Kubo
  • Masahiro Yakami
  • Yutaka Emoto
  • Mari Nishio
  • Kaori Togashi

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between visual score of emphysema and homology-based emphysema quantification (HEQ) and evaluate whether visual score was accurately predicted by machine learning and HEQ. Materials and methods: A total of 115 anonymized computed tomography images from 39 patients were obtained from a public database. Emphysema quantification of these images was performed by measuring the percentage of low-attenuation lung area (LAA%). The following values related to HEQ were obtained: nb0 and nb1. LAA% and HEQ were calculated at various threshold levels ranging from −1000 HU to −700 HU. Spearman’s correlation coefficients between emphysema quantification and visual score were calculated at the various threshold levels. Visual score was predicted by machine learning and emphysema quantification (LAA% or HEQ). Random Forest was used as a machine learning algorithm, and accuracy of prediction was evaluated by leave-one-patient-out cross validation. The difference in the accuracy was assessed using McNemar’s test. Results: The correlation coefficients between emphysema quantification and visual score were as follows: LAA% (−950 HU), 0.567; LAA% (−910 HU), 0.654; LAA% (−875 HU), 0.704; nb0 (−950 HU), 0.552; nb0 (−910 HU), 0.629; nb0 (−875 HU), 0.473; nb1 (−950 HU), 0.149; nb1 (−910 HU), 0.519; and nb1 (−875 HU), 0.716. The accuracy of prediction was as follows: LAA%, 55.7% and HEQ, 66.1%. The difference in accuracy was statistically significant (p = 0.0290). Conclusion: LAA% and HEQ at −875 HU showed a stronger correlation with visual score than those at −910 or −950 HU. HEQ was more useful than LAA% for predicting visual score.

Suggested Citation

  • Mizuho Nishio & Kazuaki Nakane & Takeshi Kubo & Masahiro Yakami & Yutaka Emoto & Mari Nishio & Kaori Togashi, 2017. "Automated prediction of emphysema visual score using homology-based quantification of low-attenuation lung region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178217
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178217&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0178217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.