IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0177590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Yi
  • Zhongqiang Liu
  • Lina Qiao
  • Chaomin Wan
  • Dezhi Mu

Abstract

Objective: Stroke volume variation (SVV) is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in adult patients. However, the predictive value of SVV is uncertain in pediatric patients. We performed the first systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness in children. Methods: PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to December 2016. Original studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness in children were considered to be eligible. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled values of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio with 95% CI. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated and area under the curve was calculated. Quality of the studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: Six studies with a total of 279 fluid boluses in 224 children were included. The analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI,0.59–0.76), pooled specificity of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.57–0.73), pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 8.24 (95% CI, 2.58–26.30), and the summary area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81. However, significant inter-study heterogeneity was found (p

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Yi & Zhongqiang Liu & Lina Qiao & Chaomin Wan & Dezhi Mu, 2017. "Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177590
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177590
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177590&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0177590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.