IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0177075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urinary leakage during sexual intercourse among women with incontinence: Incidence and risk factors

Author

Listed:
  • Hui-Hsuan Lau
  • Wen-Chu Huang
  • Tsung-Hsien Su

Abstract

Background: Coital incontinence is an under-reported disorder among women with urinary incontinence. Women seldom voluntarily report this condition, and as such, related data remains limited and is at times conflicting. Aims and objectives: To investigate the incidence and quality of life in women with coital incontinence and to determine associated predictors. Methods: This observational study involved 505 sexually active women attending the urogynecologic clinic for symptomatic urinary incontinence at a tertiary medical center. All of the patients were consulted about the experience of coital incontinence and completed evaluations including urodynamics, and valid questionnaires including the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, the Urogenital Distress Inventory and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Results: Of these women, 281 (56%) had coital incontinence, while 224 (44%) did not. Among women with coital incontinence, 181 (64%) had urodynamic-proven stress incontinence, 29 (10%) had mixed incontinence, and 15 (5%) had detrusor overactivity. Only 25 (9%) sought consultation for this disorder before direct questioning. Fifty percent (84/281) of the women rarely or sometimes had incontinence during coitus, while 33% (92/281) often had incontinence, and 17% (48/281) always had incontinence. The frequency of coital incontinence was not different regarding the types of incontinence (p = 0.153). Women with mixed incontinence had the worst sexual quality of life and incontinence-related symptom distress. Based on univariate analysis, higher body mass index (OR 2.47, p = 0.027), and lower maximal urethral closure pressure (≤ 30 cmH2O) (OR 4.56, p = 0.007) were possible predictors for coital incontinence. Multivariate analysis showed lower MUCP was independently significant predictors (OR3.93, p = 0.042) Conclusions: The prevalence of coital intercourse in urinary incontinence women was high. Coital incontinence in these women was associated with abnormal urodynamic diagnosis and urethral dysfunction.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui-Hsuan Lau & Wen-Chu Huang & Tsung-Hsien Su, 2017. "Urinary leakage during sexual intercourse among women with incontinence: Incidence and risk factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-8, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177075
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177075
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177075&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0177075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.