IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0176274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Allum
  • Agnes Allansdottir
  • George Gaskell
  • Jürgen Hampel
  • Jonathan Jackson
  • Andreea Moldovan
  • Susanna Priest
  • Sally Stares
  • Paul Stoneman

Abstract

We examine international public opinion towards stem-cell research during the period when the issue was at its most contentious. We draw upon representative sample surveys in Europe and North America, fielded in 2005 and find that the majority of people in Europe, Canada and the United States supported stem-cell research, providing it was tightly regulated, but that there were key differences between the geographical regions in the relative importance of different types of ethical position. In the U.S., moral acceptability was more influential as a driver of support for stem-cell research; in Europe the perceived benefit to society carried more weight; and in Canada the two were almost equally important. We also find that public opinion on stem-cell research was more strongly associated with religious convictions in the U.S. than in Canada and Europe, although many strongly religious citizens in all regions approved of stem-cell research. We conclude that if anything public opinion or ‘public ethics’ are likely to play an increasingly important role in framing policy and regulatory regimes for sensitive technologies in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Allum & Agnes Allansdottir & George Gaskell & Jürgen Hampel & Jonathan Jackson & Andreea Moldovan & Susanna Priest & Sally Stares & Paul Stoneman, 2017. "Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176274
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176274
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176274&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0176274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.