IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0176091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population pharmacokinetic modelling of rupatadine solution in 6–11 year olds and optimisation of the experimental design in younger children

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Santamaría
  • Javier Alejandro Estévez
  • Jordi Riba
  • Iñaki Izquierdo
  • Marta Valle

Abstract

Aims: To optimise a pharmacokinetic (PK) study design of rupatadine for 2–5 year olds by using a population PK model developed with data from a study in 6–11 year olds. The design optimisation was driven by the need to avoid children’s discomfort in the study. Methods: PK data from 6–11 year olds with allergic rhinitis available from a previous study were used to construct a population PK model which we used in simulations to assess the dose to administer in a study in 2–5 year olds. In addition, an optimal design approach was used to determine the most appropriate number of sampling groups, sampling days, total samples and sampling times. Results: A two-compartmental model with first-order absorption and elimination, with clearance dependent on weight adequately described the PK of rupatadine for 6–11 year olds. The dose selected for a trial in 2–5 year olds was 2.5 mg, as it provided a Cmax below the 3 ng/ml threshold. The optimal study design consisted of four groups of children (10 children each), a maximum sampling window of 2 hours in two clinic visits for drawing three samples on day 14 and one on day 28 coinciding with the final examination of the study. Conclusions: A PK study design was optimised in order to prioritise avoidance of discomfort for enrolled 2–5 year olds by taking only four blood samples from each child and minimising the length of hospital stays.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Santamaría & Javier Alejandro Estévez & Jordi Riba & Iñaki Izquierdo & Marta Valle, 2017. "Population pharmacokinetic modelling of rupatadine solution in 6–11 year olds and optimisation of the experimental design in younger children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176091
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176091
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176091&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0176091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.