IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0175697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Translation and validation of the Serbian primary biliary cholangitis-40 questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Zec
  • Dusan Popovic
  • Vera Matovic
  • Vladimir Nikolic
  • Ksenija Bojovic
  • Jasna Jovic
  • Ljiljana Markovic Denic
  • Tomica Milosavljevic
  • Tamara Alempijevic

Abstract

Background and aims: To translate into Serbian and validate the Primary Biliary Cholangitis–40 (PBC-40) and PBC-27 questionnaires. Materials and methods: Ninety-four consecutive outpatients with the diagnosis of PBC from three departments across two tertiary care institutions in Belgrade were enrolled from February to October 2016. Standard methodology for cultural adaption of healthcare related quality of life questionnaires was used, and included: a forward translation, backward translation and a pilot test of the Serbian PBC-40 on five patients who gave suggestions and comments. For evaluation of the questionnaires, acceptance was shown by the proportion of missing items and the internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient. The PBC-40 was self-administered under the supervision of an experienced hepatologist. The PBC-27 is a shorter version of the PBC-40. Results: A total of 92 (97.9%) of the patients were females. The mean age was 59.26 ± 1.05 years and the average length of disease was 60.45 ± 48.314 months. The average PBC-40 score was 85.62 ± 30.46. The total time needed to complete the questionnaire ranged from 7 to 16 minutes. The proportion of missing items was 5.45% (205/3760). Cronbach’s α for the entire scale was 0.93. Reliability for all of the domains of the PBC-40 was above 0.70, except for the domain “Symptoms” (α = 0.52). Overall reliability of the PBC-27 was α = 0.90. Domains “Dryness”, “Symptoms” and “Fatigue” demonstrated reliability below α = 0.70. Conclusions: The Serbian PBC-40 is a valid and reasonably adequate for use in Serbian PBC patients. The PBC-40 is preferred over the PBC-27.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Zec & Dusan Popovic & Vera Matovic & Vladimir Nikolic & Ksenija Bojovic & Jasna Jovic & Ljiljana Markovic Denic & Tomica Milosavljevic & Tamara Alempijevic, 2017. "Translation and validation of the Serbian primary biliary cholangitis-40 questionnaire," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-9, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175697
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175697
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175697&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0175697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.