IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0175382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of stimulus types in online classification of the P300 speller using language models

Author

Listed:
  • William Speier
  • Aniket Deshpande
  • Lucy Cui
  • Nand Chandravadia
  • Dustin Roberts
  • Nader Pouratian

Abstract

The P300 Speller is a common brain-computer interface communication system. There are many parallel lines of research underway to overcome the system’s low signal to noise ratio and thereby improve performance, including using famous face stimuli and integrating language information into the classifier. While both have been shown separately to provide significant improvements, the two methods have not yet been implemented together to demonstrate that the improvements are complimentary. The goal of this study is therefore twofold. First, we aim to compare the famous faces stimulus paradigm with an existing alternative stimulus paradigm currently used in commercial systems (i.e., character inversion). Second, we test these methods with language model integration to assess whether different optimization approaches can be combined to further improve BCI communication. In offline analysis using a previously published particle filter method, famous faces stimuli yielded superior results to both standard and inverting stimuli. In online trials using the particle filter method, all 10 subjects achieved a higher selection rate when using the famous faces flashing paradigm than when using inverting flashes. The improvements achieved by these methods are therefore complementary and a combination yields superior results to either method implemented individually when tested in healthy subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • William Speier & Aniket Deshpande & Lucy Cui & Nand Chandravadia & Dustin Roberts & Nader Pouratian, 2017. "A comparison of stimulus types in online classification of the P300 speller using language models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175382
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175382
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175382&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0175382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.