IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0175281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies are the strongest predictor of clinically relevant radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients achieving remission or low disease activity: A post hoc analysis of a nationwide cohort in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Tomohiro Koga
  • Akitomo Okada
  • Takaaki Fukuda
  • Toshihiko Hidaka
  • Tomonori Ishii
  • Yukitaka Ueki
  • Takao Kodera
  • Munetoshi Nakashima
  • Yuichi Takahashi
  • Seiyo Honda
  • Yoshiro Horai
  • Ryu Watanabe
  • Hiroshi Okuno
  • Toshiyuki Aramaki
  • Tomomasa Izumiyama
  • Osamu Takai
  • Taiichiro Miyashita
  • Shuntaro Sato
  • Shin-ya Kawashiri
  • Naoki Iwamoto
  • Kunihiro Ichinose
  • Mami Tamai
  • Tomoki Origuchi
  • Hideki Nakamura
  • Kiyoshi Aoyagi
  • Katsumi Eguchi
  • Atsushi Kawakami
  • the Japanese RA Patients with RRP Study Group

Abstract

Objectives: To determine prognostic factors of clinically relevant radiographic progression (CRRP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) achieving remission or low disease activity (LDA) in clinical practice. Methods: Using data from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective study in Japan, we evaluated 198 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve RA patients who were in remission or had LDA at study entry after being treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). CRRP was defined as the yearly progression of modified total Sharp score (mTSS) >3.0 U. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to explore the factors to predict CRRP at 1 year. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to estimate the performance of relevant variables for predicting CRRP. Results: The mean Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was 2.32 ± 0.58 at study entry. During the 1-year observation, remission or LDA persisted in 72% of the patients. CRRP was observed in 7.6% of the patients. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent variables to predict the development of CRRP were: anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) positivity at baseline (OR = 15.2, 95%CI 2.64–299), time-integrated DAS28-ESR during the 1 year post-baseline (7.85-unit increase, OR = 1.83, 95%CI 1.03–3.45), and the mTSS at baseline (13-unit increase, OR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.06–1.42). Conclusions: ACPA positivity was the strongest independent predictor of CRRP in patients with RA in remission or LDA. Physicians should recognize ACPA as a poor-prognosis factor regarding the radiographic outcome of RA, even among patients showing a clinically favorable response to DMARDs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomohiro Koga & Akitomo Okada & Takaaki Fukuda & Toshihiko Hidaka & Tomonori Ishii & Yukitaka Ueki & Takao Kodera & Munetoshi Nakashima & Yuichi Takahashi & Seiyo Honda & Yoshiro Horai & Ryu Watanabe , 2017. "Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies are the strongest predictor of clinically relevant radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients achieving remission or low disease activity: A post h," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175281
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175281
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175281&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0175281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.