IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0172341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma: A myth or a reality?

Author

Listed:
  • Satoru Taguchi
  • Sebastiano Buti
  • Hiroshi Fukuhara
  • Masafumi Otsuka
  • Melissa Bersanelli
  • Teppei Morikawa
  • Hideyo Miyazaki
  • Tohru Nakagawa
  • Tetsuya Fujimura
  • Haruki Kume
  • Yasuhiko Igawa
  • Yukio Homma

Abstract

Background: The benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. The present study aimed to examine the possible benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy in various clinical settings. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 436 patients with pT1-3N0-2M0 RCC who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy with curative intent at our institution between 1981 and 2009. Of them, 98 (22.5%) patients received adjuvant interferon-α (IFN-α) after surgery (adjuvant IFN-α group), while 338 (77.5%) did not (control group). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. Results: Fifty-two (11.9%) patients died from RCC with a median follow-up period of 96 months. Preliminary univariate analyses comparing CSS among treatment groups in each TNM setting revealed that CSS in the control group was equal or superior to that in the adjuvant IFN-α group in earlier stages, while the opposite trend was observed in more advanced stages. We evaluated the TNM cutoffs and demonstrated maximized benefit of adjuvant IFN-α in patients with pT2b-3cN0 (P = 0.0240). In multivariate analysis, ≥pT3 and pN1-2 were independent predictors for poor CSS in all patients. In the subgroups with ≥pT2 disease (n = 123), pN1-2 and no adjuvant treatment were significant poor prognostic factors. Conclusions: Adjuvant immunotherapy after nephrectomy may be beneficial in pT2b-3cN0 RCC. Careful consideration is, however, required for interpretation of this observational study because of its selection bias and adverse effects of IFN-α.

Suggested Citation

  • Satoru Taguchi & Sebastiano Buti & Hiroshi Fukuhara & Masafumi Otsuka & Melissa Bersanelli & Teppei Morikawa & Hideyo Miyazaki & Tohru Nakagawa & Tetsuya Fujimura & Haruki Kume & Yasuhiko Igawa & Yuki, 2017. "Benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma: A myth or a reality?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0172341
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172341
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172341&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0172341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0172341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.