IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0169618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-Analysis of the Long Term Success Rate of Different Interventions in Benign Biliary Strictures

Author

Listed:
  • Orsolya Huszár
  • Bálint Kokas
  • Péter Mátrai
  • Péter Hegyi
  • Erika Pétervári
  • Áron Vincze
  • Gabriella Pár
  • Patrícia Sarlós
  • Judit Bajor
  • József Czimmer
  • Dóra Mosztbacher
  • Katalin Márta
  • Csaba Zsiborás
  • Péter Varjú
  • Ákos Szücs

Abstract

Background: Benign biliary stricture is a rare condition and the majority of the cases are caused by operative trauma or chronic inflammation based on various etiology. Although the initial results of endoscopic, percutaneous and surgical treatment are impressive, no comparison about long term stricture resolution is available. Aims: The goal of this study was to compare the long term disease free survival in benign biliary strictures with various etiology after surgery, percutaneous transhepatic—and endoscopic treatment. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched by computer and manually for published studies. The investigators selected the publications according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, processed the data and assessed the quality of the selected studies. Meta-analysis of data of 24 publications was performed to compare long term disease free survival of different treatment groups. Results: Compared the subgroups surgery resulted in the highest long term stricture resolution rate, followed by the percutaneous transhepatic treatment, the multiple plastic stent insertion and covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS), however the difference was not significant. All compared methods are significantly superior to the single plastic stent placement. Long term stricture resolution rate irrespectively of any therapy is still not more than 84%. Conclusions: In summary, the use of single plastic stent is not recommended. Further randomized studies and innovative technical development are required for improving the treatment of benign biliary strictures.

Suggested Citation

  • Orsolya Huszár & Bálint Kokas & Péter Mátrai & Péter Hegyi & Erika Pétervári & Áron Vincze & Gabriella Pár & Patrícia Sarlós & Judit Bajor & József Czimmer & Dóra Mosztbacher & Katalin Márta & Csaba Z, 2017. "Meta-Analysis of the Long Term Success Rate of Different Interventions in Benign Biliary Strictures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0169618
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169618
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169618&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0169618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0169618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.