IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0169490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncovering precision phenotype-biomarker associations in traumatic brain injury using topological data analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica L Nielson
  • Shelly R Cooper
  • John K Yue
  • Marco D Sorani
  • Tomoo Inoue
  • Esther L Yuh
  • Pratik Mukherjee
  • Tanya C Petrossian
  • Jesse Paquette
  • Pek Y Lum
  • Gunnar E Carlsson
  • Mary J Vassar
  • Hester F Lingsma
  • Wayne A Gordon
  • Alex B Valadka
  • David O Okonkwo
  • Geoffrey T Manley
  • Adam R Ferguson
  • TRACK-TBI Investigators

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex disorder that is traditionally stratified based on clinical signs and symptoms. Recent imaging and molecular biomarker innovations provide unprecedented opportunities for improved TBI precision medicine, incorporating patho-anatomical and molecular mechanisms. Complete integration of these diverse data for TBI diagnosis and patient stratification remains an unmet challenge. Methods and findings: The Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Pilot multicenter study enrolled 586 acute TBI patients and collected diverse common data elements (TBI-CDEs) across the study population, including imaging, genetics, and clinical outcomes. We then applied topology-based data-driven discovery to identify natural subgroups of patients, based on the TBI-CDEs collected. Our hypothesis was two-fold: 1) A machine learning tool known as topological data analysis (TDA) would reveal data-driven patterns in patient outcomes to identify candidate biomarkers of recovery, and 2) TDA-identified biomarkers would significantly predict patient outcome recovery after TBI using more traditional methods of univariate statistical tests. TDA algorithms organized and mapped the data of TBI patients in multidimensional space, identifying a subset of mild TBI patients with a specific multivariate phenotype associated with unfavorable outcome at 3 and 6 months after injury. Further analyses revealed that this patient subset had high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and enrichment in several distinct genetic polymorphisms associated with cellular responses to stress and DNA damage (PARP1), and in striatal dopamine processing (ANKK1, COMT, DRD2). Conclusions: TDA identified a unique diagnostic subgroup of patients with unfavorable outcome after mild TBI that were significantly predicted by the presence of specific genetic polymorphisms. Machine learning methods such as TDA may provide a robust method for patient stratification and treatment planning targeting identified biomarkers in future clinical trials in TBI patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01565551

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica L Nielson & Shelly R Cooper & John K Yue & Marco D Sorani & Tomoo Inoue & Esther L Yuh & Pratik Mukherjee & Tanya C Petrossian & Jesse Paquette & Pek Y Lum & Gunnar E Carlsson & Mary J Vassar , 2017. "Uncovering precision phenotype-biomarker associations in traumatic brain injury using topological data analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0169490
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169490
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169490&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0169490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0169490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.