IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0169271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of Immune Cell Modules in Multicellular Transcriptomic Data

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Pollara
  • Matthew J Murray
  • James M Heather
  • Rachel Byng-Maddick
  • Naomi Guppy
  • Matthew Ellis
  • Carolin T Turner
  • Benjamin M Chain
  • Mahdad Noursadeghi

Abstract

Numerous gene signatures, or modules have been described to evaluate the immune cell composition in transcriptomes of multicellular tissue samples. However, significant diversity in module gene content for specific cell types is associated with heterogeneity in their performance. In order to rank modules that best reflect their purported association, we have generated the modular discrimination index (MDI) score that assesses expression of each module in the target cell type relative to other cells. We demonstrate that MDI scores predict modules that best reflect independently validated differences in cellular composition, and correlate with the covariance between cell numbers and module expression in human blood and tissue samples. Our analyses demonstrate that MDI scores provide an ordinal summary statistic that reliably ranks the accuracy of gene expression modules for deconvolution of cell type abundance in transcriptional data.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Pollara & Matthew J Murray & James M Heather & Rachel Byng-Maddick & Naomi Guppy & Matthew Ellis & Carolin T Turner & Benjamin M Chain & Mahdad Noursadeghi, 2017. "Validation of Immune Cell Modules in Multicellular Transcriptomic Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0169271
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169271
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169271&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0169271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0169271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.