IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0165756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Length of Stay among Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department—Using an Accelerated Failure Time Model

Author

Listed:
  • Chung-Hsien Chaou
  • Hsiu-Hsi Chen
  • Shu-Hui Chang
  • Petrus Tang
  • Shin-Liang Pan
  • Amy Ming-Fang Yen
  • Te-Fa Chiu

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) crowding continues to be an important health care issue in modern countries. Among the many crucial quality indicators for monitoring the throughput process, a patient’s length of stay (LOS) is considered the most important one since it is both the cause and the result of ED crowding. The aim of this study is to identify and quantify the influence of different patient-related or diagnostic activities-related factors on the ED LOS of discharged patients. Methods: This is a retrospective electronic data analysis. All patients who were discharged from the ED of a tertiary teaching hospital in 2013 were included. A multivariate accelerated failure time model was used to analyze the influence of the collected covariates on patient LOS. Results: A total of 106,206 patients were included for analysis with an overall medium ED LOS of 1.46 (interquartile range = 2.03) hours. Among them, 96% were discharged by a physician, 3.5% discharged against medical advice, 0.5% left without notice, and only 0.02% left without being seen by a physician. In the multivariate analysis, increased age (>80 vs

Suggested Citation

  • Chung-Hsien Chaou & Hsiu-Hsi Chen & Shu-Hui Chang & Petrus Tang & Shin-Liang Pan & Amy Ming-Fang Yen & Te-Fa Chiu, 2017. "Predicting Length of Stay among Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department—Using an Accelerated Failure Time Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0165756
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0165756
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0165756&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0165756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0165756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.