IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0163884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Resistance-Associated Substitutions in NS5A Using Direct Sequence and Cycleave Method and Treatment Outcome with Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir for Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuya Ide
  • Yuichiro Eguchi
  • Masaru Harada
  • Kunihide Ishii
  • Masaru Morita
  • Yasuyo Morita
  • Gen Sugiyama
  • Hirofumi Fukushima
  • Yoichi Yano
  • Kazunori Noguchi
  • Hiroki Nakamura
  • Junjiro Hisatomi
  • Hiroto Kumemura
  • Miki Shirachi
  • Shinji Iwane
  • Michiaki Okada
  • Yuichi Honma
  • Teruko Arinaga-Hino
  • Ichiro Miyajima
  • Kei Ogata
  • Reiichiro Kuwahara
  • Keisuke Amano
  • Toshihiro Kawaguchi
  • Ryoko Kuromatsu
  • Takuji Torimura
  • DAAs Multicenter Study Group

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir therapy in patients infected with hepatitis C virus and determine its relevance to resistant variants. Methods: A total of 629 consecutive patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 were assessed. Daclatasvir (60 mg/day) plus asunaprevir (200 mg/day) was given for 24 weeks. The virological responses and resistance-associated substitutions of hepatitis C virus mutants were examined by the direct sequence and cycleave methods were evaluated. Results: Overall, 89.4% (555/621) of patients exhibited a sustained virological response (SVR). The SVR rates in the patients with wild type, mixed, and mutant type Y93 by direct sequencing were 92.5% (520/562), 70.3% (26/37), and 42.9% (9/21), respectively. The SVR rates in the patients with 100%, 90%, 80%-30%, and 20%-0% Y93 wild by the cycleave method were 93.4% (456/488), 88.2%(30/34), 56.0%(14/25), and 36.8%(7/19), respectively. In contrast, the SVR rates for the wild type and mixed/mutant type L31 by direct sequencing were 90.2% (534/592) and 72.4% (21/29), respectively. In the multivariate analyses, the wild type Y93, no history of simeprevir therapy, the wild type L31, and low HCV RNA level were independent factors of SVR. Conclusion: NS5A resistance-associated substitutions, especially Y93H, were major factors predicting the SVR. Although direct sequencing can predict the SVR rate, the cycleave method is considered to be more useful for predicting the SVR when used in combination.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuya Ide & Yuichiro Eguchi & Masaru Harada & Kunihide Ishii & Masaru Morita & Yasuyo Morita & Gen Sugiyama & Hirofumi Fukushima & Yoichi Yano & Kazunori Noguchi & Hiroki Nakamura & Junjiro Hisatomi, 2016. "Evaluation of Resistance-Associated Substitutions in NS5A Using Direct Sequence and Cycleave Method and Treatment Outcome with Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir for Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0163884
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163884&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0163884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0163884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.