IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0162306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Proportion of Regulatory T Cells in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Takayoshi Morita
  • Yoshihito Shima
  • James Badger Wing
  • Shimon Sakaguchi
  • Atsushi Ogata
  • Atsushi Kumanogoh

Abstract

Background: Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have important functions in peripheral immune tolerance. Dysfunction of Tregs is considered to be a pivotal cause of autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, previous reports describing the proportion of Tregs among CD4+ T cells in RA patients were controversial because a range of markers are used to identify Tregs with little consensus. To clarify the status of Tregs in RA, we investigated the proportion of Tregs with focusing on the definitions of them. Methods: We identified the studies reporting the proportion of Tregs in RA patients using PubMed and Google Scholar. We performed a systematic review of them and a meta-analysis to evaluate the proportion of Tregs (FOXP3-positive and/or CD25-positive) among CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of RA patients and control subjects. Results: A total 31 studies were selected. The proportion of Tregs defined by all definitions among CD4+ T cells in PB was not significantly different between RA patients and control subjects (-0.65, [-1.30, 0.01]). Then we performed sub-analyses based on individual definitions. The proportion of Tregs defined by either CD25 or FOXP3 alone did not differ between RA patients and control subjects. The proportion of Tregs defined by both FOXP3 and CD25 was lower in RA patients than that in control subjects (-2.42 [-3.49, -1.34]). The proportion of Tregs defined by both FOXP3 and CD25 was higher in SF than that in PB among RA patients (3.27 [0.40, 6.14]). Conclusion: The status of Tregs varied according to the definition system. The proportion of Tregs defined by stricter and functionally validated methods decreased in PB and increased in SF among RA patients. If the proportion of Tregs differs in RA, accurate and functionally relevant definitions of Tregs are necessary to elucidate their status in RA.

Suggested Citation

  • Takayoshi Morita & Yoshihito Shima & James Badger Wing & Shimon Sakaguchi & Atsushi Ogata & Atsushi Kumanogoh, 2016. "The Proportion of Regulatory T Cells in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0162306
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0162306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0162306&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0162306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0162306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.