IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0161821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limited Generalizability of Registration Trials in Hepatitis C: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Floor A C Berden
  • Robert J de Knegt
  • Hans Blokzijl
  • Sjoerd D Kuiken
  • Karel J L van Erpecum
  • Sophie B Willemse
  • Jan den Hollander
  • Marit G A van Vonderen
  • Pieter Friederich
  • Bart van Hoek
  • Carin M J van Nieuwkerk
  • Joost P H Drenth
  • Wietske Kievit

Abstract

Background: Approval of drugs in chronic hepatitis C is supported by registration trials. These trials might have limited generalizability through use of strict eligibility criteria. We compared effectiveness and safety of real world hepatitis C patients eligible and ineligible for registration trials. Methods: We performed a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of chronic hepatitis C patients treated in the real world. We applied a combined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria of registration trials to our cohort to determine eligibility. We compared effectiveness and safety in eligible vs. ineligible patients, and performed sensitivity analyses with strict criteria. Further, we used log binomial regression to assess relative risks of criteria on outcomes. Results: In this cohort (n = 467) 47% of patients would have been ineligible for registration trials. Main exclusion criteria were related to hepatic decompensation and co-morbidity (cardiac disease, anemia, malignancy and neutropenia), and were associated with an increased risk for serious adverse events (RR 1.45–2.31). Ineligible patients developed significantly more serious adverse events than eligible patients (27% vs. 11%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Floor A C Berden & Robert J de Knegt & Hans Blokzijl & Sjoerd D Kuiken & Karel J L van Erpecum & Sophie B Willemse & Jan den Hollander & Marit G A van Vonderen & Pieter Friederich & Bart van Hoek & Ca, 2016. "Limited Generalizability of Registration Trials in Hepatitis C: A Nationwide Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0161821
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161821
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0161821&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0161821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0161821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.