IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0160269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Welfare Problems Facing Horses in Great Britain as Identified by Equine Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Susan V Horseman
  • Henry Buller
  • Siobhan Mullan
  • Helen R Whay

Abstract

Despite growing concerns about the welfare of horses in Great Britain (GB) there has been little surveillance of the welfare status of the horse population. Consequently we have limited knowledge of the range of welfare problems experienced by horses in GB and the situations in which poor welfare occurs. Thirty-one in-depth interviews were conducted with a cross -section of equine stakeholders, in order to explore their perceptions of the welfare problems faced by horses in GB. Welfare problems relating to health, management and riding and training were identified, including horses being under or over weight, stabling 24 hours a day and the inappropriate use of training aids. The interviewees also discussed broader contexts in which they perceived that welfare was compromised. The most commonly discussed context was where horses are kept in unsuitable environments, for example environments with poor grazing. The racing industry and travellers horses were identified as areas of the industry where horse welfare was particularly vulnerable to compromise. Lack of knowledge and financial constraints were perceived to be the root cause of poor welfare by many interviewees. The findings give insight into the range of welfare problems that may be faced by horses in GB, the contexts in which these may occur and their possible causes. Many of the problems identified by the interviewees have undergone limited scientific investigation pointing to areas where further research is likely to be necessary for welfare improvement. The large number of issues identified suggests that some form of prioritisation may be necessary to target research and resources effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan V Horseman & Henry Buller & Siobhan Mullan & Helen R Whay, 2016. "Current Welfare Problems Facing Horses in Great Britain as Identified by Equine Stakeholders," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0160269
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0160269
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0160269&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0160269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clémence Lesimple & Carole Fureix & Hervé Menguy & Martine Hausberger, 2010. "Human Direct Actions May Alter Animal Welfare, a Study on Horses (Equus caballus)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cordelie DuBois & Helen Hambly Odame & Derek B Haley & Katrina Merkies, 2018. "An exploration of industry expert perception of Canadian equine welfare using a modified Delphi technique," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Miriam Baumgartner & Sandra Kuhnke & Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen & Michael H. Erhard & Margit H. Zeitler-Feicht, 2021. "Improving Horse Welfare and Environmental Sustainability in Horse Husbandry: Linkage between Turnout and Nitrogen Surplus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0103140 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Emilie Sénèque & Stéphane Morisset & Clémence Lesimple & Martine Hausberger, 2018. "Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Emilie Sénèque & Clémence Lesimple & Stéphane Morisset & Martine Hausberger, 2019. "Could posture reflect welfare state? A study using geometric morphometrics in riding school horses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0160269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.