IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0159965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aminophylline Dosage In Asthma Exacerbations in Children: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Lewis Cooney
  • Ian Sinha
  • Daniel Hawcutt

Abstract

Background: Adequate asthma treatment of childhood exacerbations with IV aminophylline depends on appropriate dosage. Recommendations to aim for a target therapeutic range may be inappropriate as serum concentrations correlate poorly with clinical improvement. This review aims to evaluate the evidence for the optimum dosage strategy of intravenous aminophylline in children suffering an exacerbation of asthma. Methods: A systematic review comparing dosage regimens of intravenous aminophylline in children suffering an exacerbation of asthma. Primary outcomes were time until resolution of symptoms, mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were date until discharge criteria are met, actual discharge and adverse effects. Data sources: CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE and Web of Science. Search performed in March 2016 Eligibility criteria: Studies using intravenous aminophylline in children with an acute exacerbation of asthma which reported the dosage and clinical outcomes. Findings: 14 RCTs were included. There is a poor relationship between the dosage administered to children and symptom resolution, length of stay or need for mechanical ventilation. This study is limited due to its use of indirect evidence. Conclusion: The currently recommended dosage regimens may not represent the optimum safety and efficacy of intravenous aminophylline. There is a need to develop the evidence base correlating dosage with patient centered clinical outcomes, to improve prescribing practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Lewis Cooney & Ian Sinha & Daniel Hawcutt, 2016. "Aminophylline Dosage In Asthma Exacerbations in Children: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0159965
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159965
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159965&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0159965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0159965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.