IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0159728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization in Chinese Children: A Prevalence Meta-Analysis and Review of Influencing Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Jialing Lin
  • Yang Peng
  • Ping Xu
  • Ting Zhang
  • Chan Bai
  • Dongxin Lin
  • Qianting Ou
  • Zhenjiang Yao

Abstract

Objective: To determine the pooled prevalence and review the influencing factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization in Chinese children. Methods: Articles published between January 2005 and October 2015 that studied prevalence or influencing factors of MRSA nasal colonization in Chinese children were retrieved from Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Chinese VIP database, Chinese Wanfang database, Medline database and Ovid database. Prevalence and influencing factors were analyzed by STATA 13.1. Results: Thirteen articles were included. The overall prevalence of MRSA nasal colonization was 4.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.027–0.062). With an MRSA prevalence of 3.9% (95% CI: 0.018–0.061) in healthy children and 5.8% (95% CI: 0.025–0.092) in children with underlying medical conditions. Children recruited in the hospitals presented MRSA prevalence of 6.4% (95% CI: 0.037–0.091), which was higher than those recruited in the communities [2.7% (95% CI: 0.012–0.043)]. A number of influencing factors for MRSA nasal colonization were noted in three eligible studies: gender (male vs female; OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55–0.82), younger age (OR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.31–6.96 and OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.21–2.00), attending day care centers (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.28–6.76), having infectious diseases (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.10–4.52), using antibiotics (OR: 2.77; 95% CI: 1.45–5.05), residing in northern Taiwan (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.15–1.71), passive smoking (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02–1.63), and pneumococcal vaccination (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.01–1.48). Conclusions: Children could act as reservoirs of MRSA transmissions. Hospitals remained the most frequent microorganism-circulated settings. More MRSA infection control strategies are required to prevent the dissemination among children.

Suggested Citation

  • Jialing Lin & Yang Peng & Ping Xu & Ting Zhang & Chan Bai & Dongxin Lin & Qianting Ou & Zhenjiang Yao, 2016. "Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization in Chinese Children: A Prevalence Meta-Analysis and Review of Influencing Factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0159728
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159728&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0159728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0159728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.