IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0159025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diet Quality Scores and Prediction of All-Cause, Cardiovascular and Cancer Mortality in a Pan-European Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Lassale
  • Marc J Gunter
  • Dora Romaguera
  • Linda M Peelen
  • Yvonne T Van der Schouw
  • Joline W J Beulens
  • Heinz Freisling
  • David C Muller
  • Pietro Ferrari
  • Inge Huybrechts
  • Guy Fagherazzi
  • Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
  • Aurélie Affret
  • Kim Overvad
  • Christina C Dahm
  • Anja Olsen
  • Nina Roswall
  • Konstantinos K Tsilidis
  • Verena A Katzke
  • Tilman Kühn
  • Brian Buijsse
  • José-Ramón Quirós
  • Emilio Sánchez-Cantalejo
  • Nerea Etxezarreta
  • José María Huerta
  • Aurelio Barricarte
  • Catalina Bonet
  • Kay-Tee Khaw
  • Timothy J Key
  • Antonia Trichopoulou
  • Christina Bamia
  • Pagona Lagiou
  • Domenico Palli
  • Claudia Agnoli
  • Rosario Tumino
  • Francesca Fasanelli
  • Salvatore Panico
  • H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
  • Jolanda M A Boer
  • Emily Sonestedt
  • Lena Maria Nilsson
  • Frida Renström
  • Elisabete Weiderpass
  • Guri Skeie
  • Eiliv Lund
  • Karel G M Moons
  • Elio Riboli
  • Ioanna Tzoulaki

Abstract

Scores of overall diet quality have received increasing attention in relation to disease aetiology; however, their value in risk prediction has been little examined. The objective was to assess and compare the association and predictive performance of 10 diet quality scores on 10-year risk of all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality in 451,256 healthy participants to the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, followed-up for a median of 12.8y. All dietary scores studied showed significant inverse associations with all outcomes. The range of HRs (95% CI) in the top vs. lowest quartile of dietary scores in a composite model including non-invasive factors (age, sex, smoking, body mass index, education, physical activity and study centre) was 0.75 (0.72–0.79) to 0.88 (0.84–0.92) for all-cause, 0.76 (0.69–0.83) to 0.84 (0.76–0.92) for CVD and 0.78 (0.73–0.83) to 0.91 (0.85–0.97) for cancer mortality. Models with dietary scores alone showed low discrimination, but composite models also including age, sex and other non-invasive factors showed good discrimination and calibration, which varied little between different diet scores examined. Mean C-statistic of full models was 0.73, 0.80 and 0.71 for all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality. Dietary scores have poor predictive performance for 10-year mortality risk when used in isolation but display good predictive ability in combination with other non-invasive common risk factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Lassale & Marc J Gunter & Dora Romaguera & Linda M Peelen & Yvonne T Van der Schouw & Joline W J Beulens & Heinz Freisling & David C Muller & Pietro Ferrari & Inge Huybrechts & Guy Fagherazzi , 2016. "Diet Quality Scores and Prediction of All-Cause, Cardiovascular and Cancer Mortality in a Pan-European Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0159025
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159025&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0159025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0159025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.