IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0158450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mining Twitter to Assess the Public Perception of the “Internet of Things”

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang Bian
  • Kenji Yoshigoe
  • Amanda Hicks
  • Jiawei Yuan
  • Zhe He
  • Mengjun Xie
  • Yi Guo
  • Mattia Prosperi
  • Ramzi Salloum
  • François Modave

Abstract

Social media analysis has shown tremendous potential to understand public's opinion on a wide variety of topics. In this paper, we have mined Twitter to understand the public's perception of the Internet of Things (IoT). We first generated the discussion trends of the IoT from multiple Twitter data sources and validated these trends with Google Trends. We then performed sentiment analysis to gain insights of the public’s attitude towards the IoT. As anticipated, our analysis indicates that the public's perception of the IoT is predominantly positive. Further, through topic modeling, we learned that public tweets discussing the IoT were often focused on business and technology. However, the public has great concerns about privacy and security issues toward the IoT based on the frequent appearance of related terms. Nevertheless, no unexpected perceptions were identified through our analysis. Our analysis was challenged by the limited fraction of tweets relevant to our study. Also, the user demographics of Twitter users may not be strongly representative of the population of the general public.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang Bian & Kenji Yoshigoe & Amanda Hicks & Jiawei Yuan & Zhe He & Mengjun Xie & Yi Guo & Mattia Prosperi & Ramzi Salloum & François Modave, 2016. "Mining Twitter to Assess the Public Perception of the “Internet of Things”," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0158450
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158450
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158450&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0158450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0158450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.