IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0156431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cédric Benoist d’Azy
  • Bruno Pereira
  • Geraldine Naughton
  • Frédéric Chiambaretta
  • Frédéric Dutheil

Abstract

Despite endophthalmitis being the most feared complication, antibioprophylaxis remains controversial in intravitreal injections. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of antibioprophylaxis in intravitreal injections in the prevention of endophthalmitis. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Science Direct databases were searched for studies comparing groups with and without antibiotics in intravitreal injection, with the use of the following keywords: "antibiotic*", "endophthalmitis" and “intravitreal injection*”. To be included, studies needed to specify number of participants and number of endophthalmitis within each group (with and without antibiotics). We conducted meta-analysis on the prevalence of clinical endophthalmitis including both culture-proven and culture negative samples. Nine studies were included. A total of 88 incidences of endophthalmitis were reported from 174,159 injections (0.051% i.e., one incidence of endophthalmitis for 1979 injections). Specifically, 59 incidences of endophthalmitis were reported from 113,530 injections in the group with antibiotics (0.052% or one incidence of endophthalmitis for 1924 injections) and 29 incidences of endophthalmitis from 60,633 injections in the group without antibiotics (0.048% or one endophthalmitis for 2091 injections). Our meta-analysis did not report a significant difference in the prevalence of clinical endophthalimitis between the two groups with and without topical antibiotics: the odds ratio of clinical endophthalimitis was 0.804 (CI95% 0.384–1.682, p = 0.56) for the antibiotic group compared with the group without antibiotics. In conclusion, we performed the first large meta-analysis demonstrating that antibioprophylaxis is not required in intravitreal injections. Strict rules of asepsis remain the only evidence-based prophylaxis of endophthalmitis. The results support initiatives to reduce the global threat of resistance to antibiotics.

Suggested Citation

  • Cédric Benoist d’Azy & Bruno Pereira & Geraldine Naughton & Frédéric Chiambaretta & Frédéric Dutheil, 2016. "Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156431
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156431
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156431&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0156431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valentin Brusseau & Igor Tauveron & Reza Bagheri & Ukadike Chris Ugbolue & Valentin Magnon & Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois & Valentin Navel & Frédéric Dutheil, 2022. "Heart Rate Variability in Hyperthyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Frédéric Dutheil & Claire Aubert & Bruno Pereira & Michael Dambrun & Fares Moustafa & Martial Mermillod & Julien S Baker & Marion Trousselard & François-Xavier Lesage & Valentin Navel, 2019. "Suicide among physicians and health-care workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Cédric Benoist d’Azy & Bruno Pereira & Frédéric Chiambaretta & Frédéric Dutheil, 2016. "Oxidative and Anti-Oxidative Stress Markers in Chronic Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Frédéric Dutheil & Grégory Méchin & Philippe Vorilhon & Amanda C. Benson & Anne Bottet & Maëlys Clinchamps & Chloé Barasinski & Valentin Navel, 2021. "Breastfeeding after Returning to Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Mathilde Picard & Igor Tauveron & Salwan Magdasy & Thomas Benichou & Reza Bagheri & Ukadike C Ugbolue & Valentin Navel & Frédéric Dutheil, 2021. "Effect of exercise training on heart rate variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    "; antibiotic*"; ; "; endophthalmitis"; and “intravitreal injection*”. to be included; studies needed to specify number of participants and number of endophthalmitis within each group (with and without antibiotics). we conducted meta-analysis on the prevalence of clinical endophthalmitis including both culture-proven and culture negative samples. nine studies were included. a total of 88 incidences of endophthalmitis were reported from 174; 159 injections (0.051% i.e.; one incidence of endophthalmitis for 1979 injections). specifically; 59 incidences of endophthalmitis were reported from 113; 530 injections in the group with antibiotics (0.052% or one incidence of endophthalmitis for 1924 injections) and 29 incidences of endophthalmitis from 60; 633 injections in the group without antibiotics (0.048% or one endophthalmitis for 2091 injections). our meta-analysis did not report a significant difference in the prevalence of clinical endophthalimitis between the two groups with and without topical antibiotics: the odds ratio of clinical endophthalimitis was 0.804 (ci95% 0.384–1.682; p = 0.56) for the antibiotic group compared with the group without antibiotics. in conclusion; we performed the first large meta-analysis demonstrating that antibioprophylaxis is not required in intravitreal injections. strict rules of asepsis remain the only evidence-based prophylaxis of endophthalmitis. the results support initiatives to reduce the global threat of resistance to antibiotics.;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.