IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0156118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada: Results of a Consultation Study by the Canadian Immunization Research Network

Author

Listed:
  • Eve Dubé
  • Dominique Gagnon
  • Manale Ouakki
  • Julie A Bettinger
  • Maryse Guay
  • Scott Halperin
  • Kumanan Wilson
  • Janice Graham
  • Holly O Witteman
  • Shannon MacDonald
  • William Fisher
  • Laurence Monnais
  • Dat Tran
  • Arnaud Gagneur
  • Juliet Guichon
  • Vineet Saini
  • Jane M Heffernan
  • Samantha Meyer
  • S Michelle Driedger
  • Joshua Greenberg
  • Heather MacDougall
  • Canadian Immunization Research Network

Abstract

“Vaccine hesitancy” is a concept now frequently used in vaccination discourse. The increased popularity of this concept in both academic and public health circles is challenging previously held perspectives that individual vaccination attitudes and behaviours are a simple dichotomy of accept or reject. A consultation study was designed to assess the opinions of experts and health professionals concerning the definition, scope, and causes of vaccine hesitancy in Canada. We sent online surveys to two panels (1- vaccination experts and 2- front-line vaccine providers). Two questionnaires were completed by each panel, with data from the first questionnaire informing the development of questions for the second. Our participants defined vaccine hesitancy as an attitude (doubts, concerns) as well as a behaviour (refusing some / many vaccines, delaying vaccination). Our findings also indicate that both vaccine experts and front-line vaccine providers have the perception that vaccine rates have been declining and consider vaccine hesitancy an important issue to address in Canada. Diffusion of negative information online and lack of knowledge about vaccines were identified as the key causes of vaccine hesitancy by the participants. A common understanding of vaccine hesitancy among researchers, public health experts, policymakers and health care providers will better guide interventions that can more effectively address vaccine hesitancy within Canada.

Suggested Citation

  • Eve Dubé & Dominique Gagnon & Manale Ouakki & Julie A Bettinger & Maryse Guay & Scott Halperin & Kumanan Wilson & Janice Graham & Holly O Witteman & Shannon MacDonald & William Fisher & Laurence Monna, 2016. "Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada: Results of a Consultation Study by the Canadian Immunization Research Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156118
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156118
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156118&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0156118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.