IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0154778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of a Rifapentine plus Moxifloxacin-Based Regimen for Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus B Conde
  • Fernanda C Q Mello
  • Rafael Silva Duarte
  • Solange C Cavalcante
  • Valeria Rolla
  • Margareth Dalcolmo
  • Carla Loredo
  • Betina Durovni
  • Derek T Armstrong
  • Anne Efron
  • Grace L Barnes
  • Mark A Marzinke
  • Radojka M Savic
  • Kelly E Dooley
  • Silvia Cohn
  • Lawrence H Moulton
  • Richard E Chaisson
  • Susan E Dorman

Abstract

Background: The combination of rifapentine and moxifloxacin administered daily with other anti-tuberculosis drugs is highly active in mouse models of tuberculosis chemotherapy. The objective of this phase 2 clinical trial was to determine the bactericidal activity, safety, and tolerability of a regimen comprised of rifapentine, moxifloxacin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide administered daily during the first 8 weeks of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment. Methods: Adults with sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were randomized to receive either rifapentine (approximately 7.5 mg/kg) plus moxifloxacin (investigational arm), or rifampin (approximately 10 mg/kg) plus ethambutol (control) daily for 8 weeks, along with isoniazid and pyrazinamide. The primary endpoint was sputum culture status at completion of 8 weeks of treatment. Results: 121 participants (56% of accrual target) were enrolled. At completion of 8 weeks of treatment, negative cultures using Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium occurred in 47/60 (78%) participants in the investigational arm vs. 43/51 (84%, p = 0.47) in the control arm; negative cultures using liquid medium occurred in 37/47 (79%) in the investigational arm vs. 27/41 (66%, p = 0.23) in the control arm. Time to stable culture conversion was shorter for the investigational arm vs. the control arm using liquid culture medium (p = 0.03), but there was no difference using LJ medium. Median rifapentine area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) was 313 mcg*h/mL, similar to recent studies of rifapentine dosed at 450–600 mg daily. Median moxifloxacin AUC0-24 was 28.0 mcg*h/mL, much lower than in trials where rifapentine was given only intermittently with moxifloxacin. The proportion of participants discontinuing assigned treatment for reasons other than microbiological ineligibility was higher in the investigational arm vs. the control arm (11/62 [18%] vs. 3/59 [5%], p = 0.04) although the proportions of grade 3 or higher adverse events were similar (5/62 [8%] in the investigational arm vs. 6/59 [10%, p = 0.76] in the control arm). Conclusion: For intensive phase daily tuberculosis treatment in combination with isoniazid and pyrazinamide, a regimen containing moxifloxacin plus low dose rifapentine was at least as bactericidal as the control regimen containing ethambutol plus standard dose rifampin. Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00728507

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus B Conde & Fernanda C Q Mello & Rafael Silva Duarte & Solange C Cavalcante & Valeria Rolla & Margareth Dalcolmo & Carla Loredo & Betina Durovni & Derek T Armstrong & Anne Efron & Grace L Barnes , 2016. "A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of a Rifapentine plus Moxifloxacin-Based Regimen for Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0154778
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154778
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154778&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0154778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0154778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.