IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0153253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High-Quality Exome Sequencing of Whole-Genome Amplified Neonatal Dried Blood Spot DNA

Author

Listed:
  • Jesper Buchhave Poulsen
  • Francesco Lescai
  • Jakob Grove
  • Marie Bækvad-Hansen
  • Michael Christiansen
  • Christian Munch Hagen
  • Julian Maller
  • Christine Stevens
  • Shenting Li
  • Qibin Li
  • Jihua Sun
  • Jun Wang
  • Merete Nordentoft
  • Thomas Mears Werge
  • Preben Bo Mortensen
  • Anders Dupont Børglum
  • Mark Daly
  • David Michael Hougaard
  • Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm
  • Mads Vilhelm Hollegaard

Abstract

Stored neonatal dried blood spot (DBS) samples from neonatal screening programmes are a valuable diagnostic and research resource. Combined with information from national health registries they can be used in population-based studies of genetic diseases. DNA extracted from neonatal DBSs can be amplified to obtain micrograms of an otherwise limited resource, referred to as whole-genome amplified DNA (wgaDNA). Here we investigate the robustness of exome sequencing of wgaDNA of neonatal DBS samples. We conducted three pilot studies of seven, eight and seven subjects, respectively. For each subject we analysed a neonatal DBS sample and corresponding adult whole-blood (WB) reference sample. Different DNA sample types were prepared for each of the subjects. Pilot 1: wgaDNA of 2x3.2mm neonatal DBSs (DBS_2x3.2) and raw DNA extract of the WB reference sample (WB_ref). Pilot 2: DBS_2x3.2, WB_ref and a WB_ref replica sharing DNA extract with the WB_ref sample. Pilot 3: DBS_2x3.2, WB_ref, wgaDNA of 2x1.6 mm neonatal DBSs and wgaDNA of the WB reference sample. Following sequencing and data analysis, we compared pairwise variant calls to obtain a measure of similarity—the concordance rate. Concordance rates were slightly lower when comparing DBS vs WB sample types than for any two WB sample types of the same subject before filtering of the variant calls. The overall concordance rates were dependent on the variant type, with SNPs performing best. Post-filtering, the comparisons of DBS vs WB and WB vs WB sample types yielded similar concordance rates, with values close to 100%. WgaDNA of neonatal DBS samples performs with great accuracy and efficiency in exome sequencing. The wgaDNA performed similarly to matched high-quality reference—whole-blood DNA—based on concordance rates calculated from variant calls. No differences were observed substituting 2x3.2 with 2x1.6 mm discs, allowing for additional reduction of sample material in future projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesper Buchhave Poulsen & Francesco Lescai & Jakob Grove & Marie Bækvad-Hansen & Michael Christiansen & Christian Munch Hagen & Julian Maller & Christine Stevens & Shenting Li & Qibin Li & Jihua Sun &, 2016. "High-Quality Exome Sequencing of Whole-Genome Amplified Neonatal Dried Blood Spot DNA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153253
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153253
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153253&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0153253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.