IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0148434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women Are Seen More than Heard in Online Newspapers

Author

Listed:
  • Sen Jia
  • Thomas Lansdall-Welfare
  • Saatviga Sudhahar
  • Cynthia Carter
  • Nello Cristianini

Abstract

Feminist news media researchers have long contended that masculine news values shape journalists’ quotidian decisions about what is newsworthy. As a result, it is argued, topics and issues traditionally regarded as primarily of interest and relevance to women are routinely marginalised in the news, while men’s views and voices are given privileged space. When women do show up in the news, it is often as “eye candy,” thus reinforcing women’s value as sources of visual pleasure rather than residing in the content of their views. To date, evidence to support such claims has tended to be based on small-scale, manual analyses of news content. In this article, we report on findings from our large-scale, data-driven study of gender representation in online English language news media. We analysed both words and images so as to give a broader picture of how gender is represented in online news. The corpus of news content examined consists of 2,353,652 articles collected over a period of six months from more than 950 different news outlets. From this initial dataset, we extracted 2,171,239 references to named persons and 1,376,824 images resolving the gender of names and faces using automated computational methods. We found that males were represented more often than females in both images and text, but in proportions that changed across topics, news outlets and mode. Moreover, the proportion of females was consistently higher in images than in text, for virtually all topics and news outlets; women were more likely to be represented visually than they were mentioned as a news actor or source. Our large-scale, data-driven analysis offers important empirical evidence of macroscopic patterns in news content concerning the way men and women are represented.

Suggested Citation

  • Sen Jia & Thomas Lansdall-Welfare & Saatviga Sudhahar & Cynthia Carter & Nello Cristianini, 2016. "Women Are Seen More than Heard in Online Newspapers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0148434
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148434
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148434&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0148434?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuoyu Fang & Li Zou, 2023. "Narratives of Women and Gender Relations in Chinese COVID-19 Frontline Reports in 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Martha Chinomnso Okafor & Luke Ifeanyi Anorue & Paul Martin Obayi & Onyebuchi Alexander Chima, 2023. "Knowledge and Attitude Toward Media Campaigns Against Gender-Based Violence Among Nigerian Women in Southeast, Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    3. Hanne Vandenberghe, 2019. "Representation of Women in the News: Balancing between Career and Family Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 4-12.
    4. Hanne Vandenberghe, 2019. "Representation of Women in the News: Balancing between Career and Family Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 4-12.
    5. Dima Kagan & Thomas Chesney & Michael Fire, 2020. "Using data science to understand the film industry’s gender gap," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0148434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.