IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0147544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burden of Hospital Acquired Infections and Antimicrobial Use in Vietnamese Adult Intensive Care Units

Author

Listed:
  • Vu Dinh Phu
  • Heiman F L Wertheim
  • Mattias Larsson
  • Behzad Nadjm
  • Quynh-Dao Dinh
  • Lennart E Nilsson
  • Ulf Rydell
  • Tuyet Thi Diem Le
  • Son Hong Trinh
  • Hung Minh Pham
  • Cang Thanh Tran
  • Hanh Thi Hong Doan
  • Nguyen Thua Tran
  • Nhan Duc Le
  • Nhuan Van Huynh
  • Thao Phuong Tran
  • Bao Duc Tran
  • Son Truong Nguyen
  • Thao Thi Ngoc Pham
  • Tam Quang Dang
  • Chau Van Vinh Nguyen
  • Yen Minh Lam
  • Guy Thwaites
  • Kinh Van Nguyen
  • Hakan Hanberger

Abstract

Background: Vietnam is a lower middle-income country with no national surveillance system for hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). We assessed the prevalence of hospital-acquired infections and antimicrobial use in adult intensive care units (ICUs) across Vietnam. Methods: Monthly repeated point prevalence surveys were systematically conducted to assess HAI prevalence and antimicrobial use in 15 adult ICUs across Vietnam. Adults admitted to participating ICUs before 08:00 a.m. on the survey day were included. Results: Among 3287 patients enrolled, the HAI prevalence was 29.5% (965/3266 patients, 21 missing). Pneumonia accounted for 79.4% (804/1012) of HAIs Most HAIs (84.5% [855/1012]) were acquired in the survey hospital with 42.5% (363/855) acquired prior to ICU admission and 57.5% (492/855) developed during ICU admission. In multivariate analysis, the strongest risk factors for HAI acquired in ICU were: intubation (OR 2.76), urinary catheter (OR 2.12), no involvement of a family member in patient care (OR 1.94), and surgery after admission (OR 1.66). 726 bacterial isolates were cultured from 622/1012 HAIs, most frequently Acinetobacter baumannii (177/726 [24.4%]), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (100/726 [13.8%]), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (84/726 [11.6%]), with carbapenem resistance rates of 89.2%, 55.7%, and 14.9% respectively. Antimicrobials were prescribed for 84.8% (2787/3287) patients, with 73.7% of patients receiving two or more. The most common antimicrobial groups were third generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems (20.1%, 19.4%, and 14.1% of total antimicrobials, respectively). Conclusion: A high prevalence of HAIs was observed, mainly caused by Gram-negative bacteria with high carbapenem resistance rates. This in combination with a high rate of antimicrobial use illustrates the urgent need to improve rational antimicrobial use and infection control efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Vu Dinh Phu & Heiman F L Wertheim & Mattias Larsson & Behzad Nadjm & Quynh-Dao Dinh & Lennart E Nilsson & Ulf Rydell & Tuyet Thi Diem Le & Son Hong Trinh & Hung Minh Pham & Cang Thanh Tran & Hanh Thi , 2016. "Burden of Hospital Acquired Infections and Antimicrobial Use in Vietnamese Adult Intensive Care Units," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0147544
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147544
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147544&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0147544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0147544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.