IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0144110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arthropod Distribution in a Tropical Rainforest: Tackling a Four Dimensional Puzzle

Author

Listed:
  • Yves Basset
  • Lukas Cizek
  • Philippe Cuénoud
  • Raphael K Didham
  • Vojtech Novotny
  • Frode Ødegaard
  • Tomas Roslin
  • Alexey K Tishechkin
  • Jürgen Schmidl
  • Neville N Winchester
  • David W Roubik
  • Henri-Pierre Aberlenc
  • Johannes Bail
  • Héctor Barrios
  • Jonathan R Bridle
  • Gabriela Castaño-Meneses
  • Bruno Corbara
  • Gianfranco Curletti
  • Wesley Duarte da Rocha
  • Domir De Bakker
  • Jacques H C Delabie
  • Alain Dejean
  • Laura L Fagan
  • Andreas Floren
  • Roger L Kitching
  • Enrique Medianero
  • Evandro Gama de Oliveira
  • Jérôme Orivel
  • Marc Pollet
  • Mathieu Rapp
  • Sérvio P Ribeiro
  • Yves Roisin
  • Jesper B Schmidt
  • Line Sørensen
  • Thomas M Lewinsohn
  • Maurice Leponce

Abstract

Quantifying the spatio-temporal distribution of arthropods in tropical rainforests represents a first step towards scrutinizing the global distribution of biodiversity on Earth. To date most studies have focused on narrow taxonomic groups or lack a design that allows partitioning of the components of diversity. Here, we consider an exceptionally large dataset (113,952 individuals representing 5,858 species), obtained from the San Lorenzo forest in Panama, where the phylogenetic breadth of arthropod taxa was surveyed using 14 protocols targeting the soil, litter, understory, lower and upper canopy habitats, replicated across seasons in 2003 and 2004. This dataset is used to explore the relative influence of horizontal, vertical and seasonal drivers of arthropod distribution in this forest. We considered arthropod abundance, observed and estimated species richness, additive decomposition of species richness, multiplicative partitioning of species diversity, variation in species composition, species turnover and guild structure as components of diversity. At the scale of our study (2km of distance, 40m in height and 400 days), the effects related to the vertical and seasonal dimensions were most important. Most adult arthropods were collected from the soil/litter or the upper canopy and species richness was highest in the canopy. We compared the distribution of arthropods and trees within our study system. Effects related to the seasonal dimension were stronger for arthropods than for trees. We conclude that: (1) models of beta diversity developed for tropical trees are unlikely to be applicable to tropical arthropods; (2) it is imperative that estimates of global biodiversity derived from mass collecting of arthropods in tropical rainforests embrace the strong vertical and seasonal partitioning observed here; and (3) given the high species turnover observed between seasons, global climate change may have severe consequences for rainforest arthropods.

Suggested Citation

  • Yves Basset & Lukas Cizek & Philippe Cuénoud & Raphael K Didham & Vojtech Novotny & Frode Ødegaard & Tomas Roslin & Alexey K Tishechkin & Jürgen Schmidl & Neville N Winchester & David W Roubik & Henri, 2015. "Arthropod Distribution in a Tropical Rainforest: Tackling a Four Dimensional Puzzle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0144110
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144110&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0144110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0144110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.