IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0144070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electricity and Water Conservation on College and University Campuses in Response to National Competitions among Dormitories: Quantifying Relationships between Behavior, Conservation Strategies and Psychological Metrics

Author

Listed:
  • John E Petersen
  • Cynthia M Frantz
  • Md Rumi Shammin
  • Tess M Yanisch
  • Evan Tincknell
  • Noel Myers

Abstract

“Campus Conservation Nationals” (CCN) is a recurring, nation-wide electricity and water-use reduction competition among dormitories on college campuses. We conducted a two year empirical study of the competition’s effects on resource consumption and the relationship between conservation, use of web technology and various psychological measures. Significant reductions in electricity and water use occurred during the two CCN competitions examined (n = 105,000 and 197,000 participating dorm residents respectively). In 2010, overall reductions during the competition were 4% for electricity and 6% for water. The top 10% of dorms achieved 28% and 36% reductions in electricity and water respectively. Participation was larger in 2012 and reductions were slightly smaller (i.e. 3% electricity). The fact that no seasonal pattern in electricity use was evident during non-competition periods suggests that results are attributable to the competition. Post competition resource use data collected in 2012 indicates that conservation behavior was sustained beyond the competition. Surveys were used to assess psychological and behavioral responses (n = 2,900 and 2,600 in 2010 and 2012 respectively). Electricity reductions were significantly correlated with: web visitation, specific conservation behaviors, awareness of the competition, motivation and sense of empowerment. However, participants were significantly more motivated than empowered. Perceived benefits of conservation were skewed towards global and future concerns while perceived barriers tended to be local. Results also suggest that competitions may be useful for “preaching beyond the choir”–engaging those who might lack prior intrinsic or political motivation. Although college life is distinct, certain conclusions related to competitions, self-efficacy, and motivation and social norms likely extend to other residential settings.

Suggested Citation

  • John E Petersen & Cynthia M Frantz & Md Rumi Shammin & Tess M Yanisch & Evan Tincknell & Noel Myers, 2015. "Electricity and Water Conservation on College and University Campuses in Response to National Competitions among Dormitories: Quantifying Relationships between Behavior, Conservation Strategies and Ps," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-41, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0144070
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144070
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144070&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0144070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael F. Maniates, 2001. "Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 1(3), pages 31-52, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niklas Harring & Sverker C. Jagers, 2013. "Should We Trust in Values? Explaining Public Support for Pro-Environmental Taxes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Debra Javeline & Tracy Kijewski-Correa & Angela Chesler, 2019. "Does it matter if you “believe” in climate change? Not for coastal home vulnerability," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 511-532, August.
    3. Manisha Anantharaman, 2018. "Critical sustainable consumption: a research agenda," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 553-561, December.
    4. Teresa Kramarz & Susan Park, 2016. "Accountability in Global Environmental Governance: A Meaningful Tool for Action?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Veronika Winter & Johanna Kranz & Andrea Möller, 2022. "Climate Change Education Challenges from Two Different Perspectives of Change Agents: Perceptions of School Students and Pre-Service Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-29, May.
    6. Janina Grabs & Graeme Auld & Benjamin Cashore, 2021. "Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1183-1208, October.
    7. Mark W. Neff & Zander Albertson, 2020. "Does higher education prepare students to bridge divides in today’s democracy?," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 196-204, June.
    8. Brian Burgoon & Luc Fransen, 2018. "Might Corporate Social Responsibility Hollow Out Support for Public Assistance in Europe?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 128-163, March.
    9. Stuart Bryce Capstick, 2013. "Public Understanding of Climate Change as a Social Dilemma," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-18, August.
    10. James D. Proctor, 2020. "EcoTypes: exploring environmental ideas, discovering deep difference," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 178-188, June.
    11. Schanes, Karin & Jäger, Jill & Drummond, Paul, 2019. "Three Scenario Narratives for a Resource-Efficient and Low-Carbon Europe in 2050," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 70-79.
    12. Marlyne Sahakian & Malaïka Nagel & Valentine Donzelot & Orlane Moynat & Wladyslaw Senn, 2021. "Flying Less for Work and Leisure? Co-Designing a City-Wide Change Initiative in Geneva," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 299-313.
    13. Ortar, Nathalie, 2018. "Dealing with energy crises: Working and living arrangements in peri-urban France," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 72-78.
    14. Charlotte Demonsant & Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2022. "Questioning the logic of collective climate action: framing the climate action situation and the model of "Common rescue"," Post-Print hal-03722106, HAL.
    15. Robbins, M.J., 2013. "Locating food sovereignty: geographical and sectoral distance in the global food system," ISS Working Papers - General Series 557, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    16. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2023. "Confronting the deep problem of consumption: Why individual responsibility for mindful consumption matters," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 785-820, April.
    17. Luc Fransen & Brian Burgoon & Luc Fransen & Brian Burgoon, 2017. "Support for Ethical Consumerism and Welfare States in the Global Economy: Complements or Substitutes?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s3), pages 42-55, May.
    18. Antonin Pottier & Gaëlle Le Treut, 2023. "Quantifying GHG emissions enabled by capital and labor: Economic and gender inequalities in France," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 624-636, April.
    19. Jessica F. Green, 2017. "The strength of weakness: pseudo-clubs in the climate regime," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 41-52, September.
    20. David Evans & Daniel Welch & Joanne Swaffield, 2017. "Constructing and mobilizing ‘the consumer’: Responsibility, consumption and the politics of sustainability," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(6), pages 1396-1412, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0144070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.