IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0140232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia K Smith
  • Wendy Selig
  • Matthew Harker
  • Jamie N Roberts
  • Sharon Hesterlee
  • David Leventhal
  • Richard Klein
  • Bray Patrick-Lake
  • Amy P Abernethy

Abstract

Objective: Patient-centered clinical trial design and execution is becoming increasingly important. No best practice guidelines exist despite a key stakeholder declaration to create more effective engagement models. This study aims to gain a better understanding of attitudes and practices for engaging patient groups so that actionable recommendations may be developed. Methods: Individuals from industry, academic institutions, and patient groups were identified through Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative and Drug Information Association rosters and mailing lists. Objectives, practices, and perceived barriers related to engaging patient groups in the planning, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials were reported in an online survey. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of survey data followed a literature review to inform survey questions. Results: Survey respondents (n = 179) valued the importance of involving patient groups in research; however, patient group respondents valued their contributions to research protocol development, funding acquisition, and interpretation of study results more highly than those contributions were valued by industry and academic respondents (all p

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia K Smith & Wendy Selig & Matthew Harker & Jamie N Roberts & Sharon Hesterlee & David Leventhal & Richard Klein & Bray Patrick-Lake & Amy P Abernethy, 2015. "Patient Engagement Practices in Clinical Research among Patient Groups, Industry, and Academia in the United States: A Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0140232
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140232&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0140232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0140232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.