IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0138755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Piloting PrePex for Adult and Adolescent Male Circumcision in South Africa – Pain Is an Issue

Author

Listed:
  • Limakatso Lebina
  • Noah Taruberekera
  • Minja Milovanovic
  • Karin Hatzold
  • Miriam Mhazo
  • Cynthia Nhlapo
  • Nkeko Tshabangu
  • Mmatsie Manentsa
  • Victoria Kazangarare
  • Millicent Makola
  • Scott Billy
  • Neil Martinson

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organisation and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS have recommended the scale-up of Medical Male Circumcision (MMC) in countries with high HIV and low MMC prevalence. PrePex device circumcision is proposed as an alternate method for scaling up MMC. Objective: Evaluate safety and feasibility of PrePex in South Africa. Design: A multisite prospective cohort PrePex study in adults and adolescents at three MMC clinics. Participants were followed-up 8 times, up to 56 days after PrePex placement. Results: In total, 398 PrePex circumcisions were performed (315 adults and 83 adolescents) their median ages were 26 (IQR: 22–30) and 16 years (IQR: 15–17), respectively. The median time for device placement across both groups was 6 minutes (IQR: 5–9) with the leading PrePex sizes being B (30%) and C (35%) for adults (18–45 years), and A (31%) and B (38%) for adolescents (14–17 years). Additional sizes (size 12–20) were rarely used, even in the younger age group. Pain of device application was minimal but that of removal was severe. However, described pain abated rapidly and almost no pain was reported 1 hour after removal. The Adverse Events rate were experienced by 2.7% (11/398) of all participants, three of which were serious (2 displacements and 1 self-removal requiring prompt surgery). None of the Adverse Events required hospitalization. The majority of participants returned to work within a day of device placement. Conclusion: Our study shows that PrePex is a safe MMC method, for males 14 years and above. PrePex circumcision had a similar adverse event rate to that reported for surgical MMC, but device removal caused high levels of pain, which subsided rapidly.

Suggested Citation

  • Limakatso Lebina & Noah Taruberekera & Minja Milovanovic & Karin Hatzold & Miriam Mhazo & Cynthia Nhlapo & Nkeko Tshabangu & Mmatsie Manentsa & Victoria Kazangarare & Millicent Makola & Scott Billy & , 2015. "Piloting PrePex for Adult and Adolescent Male Circumcision in South Africa – Pain Is an Issue," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0138755
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138755
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138755&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0138755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0138755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.