IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0136979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repeated Witnessing of Conspecifics in Pain: Effects on Emotional Contagion

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Carrillo
  • Filippo Migliorati
  • Rune Bruls
  • Yingying Han
  • Mirjam Heinemans
  • Ilanah Pruis
  • Valeria Gazzola
  • Christian Keysers

Abstract

Witnessing of conspecifics in pain has been shown to elicit socially triggered freezing in rodents. It is unknown how robust this response is to repeated exposure to a cage-mate experiencing painful stimulation. To address this question, shock-experienced Observer rats repeatedly witnessed familiar Demonstrators receive painful footshocks (six sessions). Results confirm that Observers freeze during the first testing session. The occurrence of this behaviour however gradually diminished as the experimental sessions progressed, reaching minimal freezing levels by the end of the experiments. In contrast, the appearance and continuous increase in the frequency of yawning, a behavior that was inhibited by metyrapone (i.e,. a glucocorticoid synthesis blocker), might represent an alternative coping strategy, suggesting that the observer’s reduced freezing does not necessarily indicate a disappearance in the affective response to the Demonstrator’s distress.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Carrillo & Filippo Migliorati & Rune Bruls & Yingying Han & Mirjam Heinemans & Ilanah Pruis & Valeria Gazzola & Christian Keysers, 2015. "Repeated Witnessing of Conspecifics in Pain: Effects on Emotional Contagion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0136979
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0136979
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0136979&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0136979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0136979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.