IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0133657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends and Patterns of Urodynamic Studies in U.S. Males, 2000–2012

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell M Conover
  • Michele Jonsson Funk
  • Alan C Kinlaw
  • Kristy M Borawski
  • Jennifer M Wu

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate trends in urodynamic procedures in the U.S. males from 2000–2012 and determine if a 2010 decline in reimbursement was associated with decreased utilization. Subjects and methods: We analyzed 2000–2012 administrative healthcare claims from Truven Health’s Marketscan Database and evaluated males ≥18 years of age. We identified cystometrograms and any concurrent procedures using procedure billing codes. Covariates included age, year of cystometrogram, region and associated diagnosis codes. We estimated standardized cystometrogram utilization rates per 10,000 person-years (PY). We used age, region, and calendar year adjusted Poisson regression models to estimate the independent effect of calendar year and region. Results: During 127,558,186 PY of observation, we identified 153,168 cystometrograms for an overall utilization rate of 12.0 per 10,000 PY (95% CI 11.9–12.1). Cystometrogram utilization increased with age, peaking at age 85 with a rate of 77.7 per 10,000 PY (95% CI 74.7–80.7). Adjusted cystometrogram utilization rate ratios show that compared to a referent of 2000–2004, utilization was significantly higher in each year 2005 to 2011 among all patients and in 2012 among patients ≥ 65. Standardized utilization rates peaked in 2008 at 12.4 per 10,000 PY (95% CI 12.2–12.6), remained elevated until 2010, then decreased slightly in 2011 and substantially in 2012 to 8.5 per 10,000 PY (95% CI 8.4–8.7). Conclusions: Utilization of urodynamic procedures increased until 2010 and decreased thereafter. Utilization was greatest among men older than 65.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell M Conover & Michele Jonsson Funk & Alan C Kinlaw & Kristy M Borawski & Jennifer M Wu, 2015. "Trends and Patterns of Urodynamic Studies in U.S. Males, 2000–2012," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0133657
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133657
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133657&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0133657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0133657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.