IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0132953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cholangiocarcinoma: Correlation between Molecular Profiling and Imaging Phenotypes

Author

Listed:
  • Eran Sadot
  • Amber L Simpson
  • Richard K G Do
  • Mithat Gonen
  • Jinru Shia
  • Peter J Allen
  • Michael I D’Angelica
  • Ronald P DeMatteo
  • T Peter Kingham
  • William R Jarnagin

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate associations between imaging features of cholangiocarcinoma by visual assessment and texture analysis, which quantifies heterogeneity in tumor enhancement patterns, with molecular profiles based on hypoxia markers. Methods: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study of CT images of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, obtained before surgery. Immunostaining for hypoxia markers (EGFR, VEGF, CD24, P53, MDM2, MRP-1, HIF-1α, CA-IX, and GLUT1) was performed on pre-treatment liver biopsies. Quantitative imaging phenotypes were determined by texture analysis with gray level co-occurrence matrixes. The correlations between quantitative imaging phenotypes, qualitative imaging features (measured by radiographic inspection alone), and expression levels of the hypoxia markers from the 25 tumors were assessed. Results: Twenty-five patients were included with a median age of 62 years (range: 54–84). The median tumor size was 10.2 cm (range: 4–14), 10 (40%) were single tumors, and 90% were moderately differentiated. Positive immunostaining was recorded for VEGF in 67% of the cases, EGFR in 75%, and CD24 in 55%. On multiple linear regression analysis, quantitative imaging phenotypes correlated significantly with EGFR and VEGF expression levels (R2 = 0.4, p

Suggested Citation

  • Eran Sadot & Amber L Simpson & Richard K G Do & Mithat Gonen & Jinru Shia & Peter J Allen & Michael I D’Angelica & Ronald P DeMatteo & T Peter Kingham & William R Jarnagin, 2015. "Cholangiocarcinoma: Correlation between Molecular Profiling and Imaging Phenotypes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132953
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132953
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132953&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0132953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.