IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0132906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Random Sampling with Interspike-Intervals of the Exponential Integrate and Fire Neuron: A Computational Interpretation of UP-States

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Steimer
  • Kaspar Schindler

Abstract

Oscillations between high and low values of the membrane potential (UP and DOWN states respectively) are an ubiquitous feature of cortical neurons during slow wave sleep and anesthesia. Nevertheless, a surprisingly small number of quantitative studies have been conducted only that deal with this phenomenon’s implications for computation.Here we present a novel theory that explains on a detailed mathematical level the computational benefits of UP states. The theory is based on random sampling by means of interspike intervals (ISIs) of the exponential integrate and fire (EIF) model neuron, such that each spike is considered a sample, whose analog value corresponds to the spike’s preceding ISI. As we show, the EIF’s exponential sodium current, that kicks in when balancing a noisy membrane potential around values close to the firing threshold, leads to a particularly simple, approximative relationship between the neuron’s ISI distribution and input current. Approximation quality depends on the frequency spectrum of the current and is improved upon increasing the voltage baseline towards threshold. Thus, the conceptually simpler leaky integrate and fire neuron that is missing such an additional current boost performs consistently worse than the EIF and does not improve when voltage baseline is increased. For the EIF in contrast, the presented mechanism is particularly effective in the high-conductance regime, which is a hallmark feature of UP-states.Our theoretical results are confirmed by accompanying simulations, which were conducted for input currents of varying spectral composition. Moreover, we provide analytical estimations of the range of ISI distributions the EIF neuron can sample from at a given approximation level. Such samples may be considered by any algorithmic procedure that is based on random sampling, such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo or message-passing methods.Finally, we explain how spike-based random sampling relates to existing computational theories about UP states during slow wave sleep and present possible extensions of the model in the context of spike-frequency adaptation.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Steimer & Kaspar Schindler, 2015. "Random Sampling with Interspike-Intervals of the Exponential Integrate and Fire Neuron: A Computational Interpretation of UP-States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132906
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132906
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132906&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0132906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosa Cossart & Dmitriy Aronov & Rafael Yuste, 2003. "Attractor dynamics of network UP states in the neocortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6937), pages 283-288, May.
    2. Yousheng Shu & Andrea Hasenstaub & David A. McCormick, 2003. "Turning on and off recurrent balanced cortical activity," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6937), pages 288-293, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sreedhar S Kumar & Jan Wülfing & Samora Okujeni & Joschka Boedecker & Martin Riedmiller & Ulrich Egert, 2016. "Autonomous Optimization of Targeted Stimulation of Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Anne-Marie M Oswald & Nathaniel N Urban & Brent Doiron, 2011. "Balanced Synaptic Input Shapes the Correlation between Neural Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Christian Meisel & Andreas Klaus & Christian Kuehn & Dietmar Plenz, 2015. "Critical Slowing Down Governs the Transition to Neuron Spiking," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Balázs Ujfalussy & Tamás Kiss & Péter Érdi, 2009. "Parallel Computational Subunits in Dentate Granule Cells Generate Multiple Place Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Milena Raffi & Ralph M Siegel, 2007. "A Functional Architecture of Optic Flow in the Inferior Parietal Lobule of the Behaving Monkey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Martinez-Saito, Mario, 2022. "Discrete scaling and criticality in a chain of adaptive excitable integrators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Roberto F Galán, 2008. "On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Kyriaki Sidiropoulou & Panayiota Poirazi, 2012. "Predictive Features of Persistent Activity Emergence in Regular Spiking and Intrinsic Bursting Model Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Suchin S Gururangan & Alexander J Sadovsky & Jason N MacLean, 2014. "Analysis of Graph Invariants in Functional Neocortical Circuitry Reveals Generalized Features Common to Three Areas of Sensory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    11. Emili Balaguer-Ballester & Christopher C Lapish & Jeremy K Seamans & Daniel Durstewitz, 2011. "Attracting Dynamics of Frontal Cortex Ensembles during Memory-Guided Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Ghanim Ullah & Steven J Schiff, 2010. "Assimilating Seizure Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Nariman Valizadeh & Majid Mirzaei & Mohammed Falah Allawi & Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan & Nuruol Syuhadaa Mohd & Aini Hussain & Ahmed El-Shafie, 2017. "Artificial intelligence and geo-statistical models for stream-flow forecasting in ungauged stations: state of the art," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(3), pages 1377-1392, April.
    14. Vanessa F Descalzo & Roberto Gallego & Maria V Sanchez-Vives, 2014. "Adaptation in the Visual Cortex: Influence of Membrane Trajectory and Neuronal Firing Pattern on Slow Afterpotentials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-10, November.
    15. Weijie Ye & Xiaoying Chen, 2023. "Effects of NMDA Receptor Hypofunction on Inhibitory Control in a Two-Layer Neural Circuit Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Borges, F.S. & Protachevicz, P.R. & Pena, R.F.O. & Lameu, E.L. & Higa, G.S.V. & Kihara, A.H. & Matias, F.S. & Antonopoulos, C.G. & de Pasquale, R. & Roque, A.C. & Iarosz, K.C. & Ji, P. & Batista, A.M., 2020. "Self-sustained activity of low firing rate in balanced networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 537(C).
    17. Gustavo Deco & Daniel Martí & Anders Ledberg & Ramon Reig & Maria V Sanchez Vives, 2009. "Effective Reduced Diffusion-Models: A Data Driven Approach to the Analysis of Neuronal Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Robert R Kerr & Anthony N Burkitt & Doreen A Thomas & Matthieu Gilson & David B Grayden, 2013. "Delay Selection by Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons Receiving Oscillatory Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Shrey Dutta & Kartik K. Iyer & Sampsa Vanhatalo & Michael Breakspear & James A. Roberts, 2023. "Mechanisms underlying pathological cortical bursts during metabolic depletion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.