IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0132543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loss-To-Follow-Up on Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment in Gujarat, India: The WHEN and WHO of It

Author

Listed:
  • Kalpita S Shringarpure
  • Petros Isaakidis
  • Karuna D Sagili
  • R K Baxi

Abstract

Background: Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a rising global threat to public health and concerted efforts for its treatment are diluted if the outcomes are not successful, loss to follow up (LFU) being one of them. It is therefore necessary to know the proportion and the associated reasons for LFU and devise effective patient-centered strategies to improve retention in care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the MDR-TB treatment site (DR-TB Site)in Central Gujarat among all patients registered from February 2010 to June 2013.LFU patients were defined as those whose treatment was interrupted for two or more consecutive months for any reason. Descriptive statistics, survival analysis and multivariate modeling were used to determine the proportion of patients LFU and to assess associations between LFU and selected demographic and clinical factors. Results: A total of 796 patients were enrolled during the study period; 71.9% were male and the median age was 35 years [Interquartile range (IQR) 27-45].The overall proportion of LFU patients was 153/796 (19.2%).The majority of LFU patients (133/153 i.e.87%) were lost within the first 6 months of treatment. Ambulatory treatment initiation (adjusted Hazards ratio aHR=2.63, CI:1.01-6.86), different providers in IP and CP ( aHR=1.27, CI:1.18-1.38)and culture conversion after more than 4 months of treatment(aHR=1.34, CI: 1.21-1.49)were found to be significantly associated with LFU in multivariate models. Conclusions: A high proportion of LFU among patients on MDR-TB treatment was found in a programmatic setting in India. Clinical but equally important programmatic factors were associated with LFU, accounting for one-fifth of all the outcomes of MDR-TB treatment. Proper training for DOT providers and aggressive counseling and health system strengthening with patient friendly follow up services may help reduce LFU.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalpita S Shringarpure & Petros Isaakidis & Karuna D Sagili & R K Baxi, 2015. "Loss-To-Follow-Up on Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment in Gujarat, India: The WHEN and WHO of It," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132543
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132543
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132543&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0132543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shama D Ahuja & David Ashkin & Monika Avendano & Rita Banerjee & Melissa Bauer & Jamie N Bayona & Mercedes C Becerra & Andrea Benedetti & Marcos Burgos & Rosella Centis & Eward D Chan & Chen-Yuan Chia, 2012. "Multidrug Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment Regimens and Patient Outcomes: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of 9,153 Patients," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Decroo & Aung Kya Jai Maug & Mohamed Anwar Hossain & Cécile Uwizeye & Mourad Gumusboga & Tine Demeulenaere & Nimer Ortuño-Gutiérrez & Bouke C de Jong & Armand Van Deun, 2020. "Injectables’ key role in rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis shorter treatment regimen outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Guanbo Wang & Mireille E. Schnitzer & Dick Menzies & Piret Viiklepp & Timothy H. Holtz & Andrea Benedetti, 2020. "Estimating treatment importance in multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis using Targeted Learning: An observational individual patient data network meta‐analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 1007-1016, September.
    3. Maeve K Lalor & Jane Greig & Sholpan Allamuratova & Sandy Althomsons & Zinaida Tigay & Atadjan Khaemraev & Kai Braker & Oleksander Telnov & Philipp du Cros, 2013. "Risk Factors Associated with Default from Multi- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment, Uzbekistan: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-5, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.