IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0132379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Hongjun Liu
  • Huangkai Zhou
  • Yongsheng Wu
  • Xiao Li
  • Jing Zhao
  • Tao Zuo
  • Xuan Zhang
  • Yongzhong Zhang
  • Sisi Liu
  • Yaou Shen
  • Haijian Lin
  • Zhiming Zhang
  • Kaijian Huang
  • Thomas Lübberstedt
  • Guangtang Pan

Abstract

Genomic selection is a promising research area due to its practical application in breeding. In this study, impact of realized genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium (LD) on marker density and training population size required was investigated and their impact on practical application was further discussed. This study is based on experimental data of two populations derived from the same two founder lines (B73, Mo17). Two populations were genotyped with different marker sets at different density: IBM Syn4 and IBM Syn10. A high-density marker set in Syn10 was imputed into the Syn4 population with low marker density. Seven different prediction scenarios were carried out with a random regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) model. The result showed that the closer the real genetic relationship between training and validation population, the fewer markers were required to reach a good prediction accuracy. Taken the short-term cost for consideration, relationship information is more valuable than LD information. Meanwhile, the result indicated that accuracies based on high LD between QTL and markers were more stable over generations, thus LD information would provide more robust prediction capacity in practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongjun Liu & Huangkai Zhou & Yongsheng Wu & Xiao Li & Jing Zhao & Tao Zuo & Xuan Zhang & Yongzhong Zhang & Sisi Liu & Yaou Shen & Haijian Lin & Zhiming Zhang & Kaijian Huang & Thomas Lübberstedt & Gu, 2015. "The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132379
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132379
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132379&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0132379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.