Author
Listed:
- Eunji Choi
- Yoon Young Lee
- Hyo Joong Yoon
- Sangeun Lee
- Mina Suh
- Boyoung Park
- Jae Kwan Jun
- Yeol Kim
- Kui Son Choi
Abstract
Background: The possibility of developing breast cancer is a concern for all women; however, few studies have examined the relationship between cancer worry and the stages of adoption for breast cancer screening in Korea. Here, we investigated the associations between cancer worry, the stages of adopting breast cancer screening, and socio-demographic factors known to influence screening behaviors. Methods: This study was based on the 2013 Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, an annual cross-sectional survey that utilized nationally representative random sampling to investigate cancer screening rates. Data were analyzed from 1,773 randomly selected women aged 40–74 years. Chi-squared tests and multinomial logistic analyses were conducted to determine the associations between cancer worry and the stages of adoption for breast cancer screening and to outline the factors associated with each stage. Results: Korean women were classified into the following stages of adoption for breast cancer screening: pre-contemplation (24.7%), contemplation (13.0%), action/maintenance (50.8%), relapse risk (8.9%), and relapse (2.6%). Women in the action/maintenance stages reported more moderate to higher levels of worry about getting cancer than those in the pre-contemplation stage. Further, age of 40–49 years and having private cancer insurance were associated with women in the action/maintenance stages. Conclusion: Interventions to address breast cancer worry may play an important role in increasing participation and equity in breast cancer screening.
Suggested Citation
Eunji Choi & Yoon Young Lee & Hyo Joong Yoon & Sangeun Lee & Mina Suh & Boyoung Park & Jae Kwan Jun & Yeol Kim & Kui Son Choi, 2015.
"Relationship between Cancer Worry and Stages of Adoption for Breast Cancer Screening among Korean Women,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0132351
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132351
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0132351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.