IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0130873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yunlan Zhou
  • Bingxian Bian
  • Xiangliang Yuan
  • Guohua Xie
  • Yanhui Ma
  • Lisong Shen

Abstract

Background: The prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in ovarian cancer has been investigated in previous studies, but the results are controversial. Therefore we performed a meta-analysis to systematically review these data and evaluate the value of CTCs in ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: A literary search for relevant studies was performed on Embase, Medline and Web of Science databases. Then pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for survival with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, meta-regression analyses and publication bias were conducted. Results: This meta-analysis is based on 11 publications and comprises a total of 1129 patients. The prognostic value of the CTC status was significant in overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.61;95% CI,1.22–2.13) and progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 1.44; 95%CI, 1.18–1.75). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that the value of CTC status in OS was significant in "RT-PCR" subgroup (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.34–3.03), whereas it was not significant in "CellSearch" subgroup (HR, 1.15; 95% CI 0.45–2.92) and "other ICC" subgroup (HR, 1.09; 95% CI 0.62–1.90). The presence of CTC was also associated with an increased CA-125 (OR, 4.07; 95%CI, 1.87–8.85). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that CTC status is associated with OS and PFS/DFS in ovarian cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunlan Zhou & Bingxian Bian & Xiangliang Yuan & Guohua Xie & Yanhui Ma & Lisong Shen, 2015. "Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0130873
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0130873&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0130873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianwei Huang & Ke Wang & Jianjun Xu & Jian Huang & Tao Zhang, 2013. "Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-8, November.
    2. Shuyi Wang & Gang Zheng & Boran Cheng & Fangfang Chen & Zhenmeng Wang & Yuanyuan Chen & You Wang & Bin Xiong, 2014. "Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) Detected by RT-PCR and Its Prognostic Role in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-7, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0130873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.