IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0128491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk of Gastric Cancer by Water Source: Evidence from the Golestan Case-Control Study

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Eichelberger
  • Gwen Murphy
  • Arash Etemadi
  • Christian C Abnet
  • Farhad Islami
  • Ramin Shakeri
  • Reza Malekzadeh
  • Sanford M Dawsey

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the world’s fifth most common cancer, and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Over 70% of incident cases and deaths occur in developing countries. We explored whether disparities in access to improved drinking water sources were associated with GC risk in the Golestan Gastric Cancer Case Control Study. Methods and Findings: 306 cases and 605 controls were matched on age, gender, and place of residence. We conducted unconditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education, head of household education, place of birth and residence, homeownership, home size, wealth score, vegetable consumption, and H. pylori seropositivity. Fully-adjusted ORs were 0.23 (95% CI: 0.05–1.04) for chlorinated well water, 4.58 (95% CI: 2.07–10.16) for unchlorinated well water, 4.26 (95% CI: 1.81–10.04) for surface water, 1.11 (95% CI: 0.61–2.03) for water from cisterns, and 1.79 (95% CI: 1.20–2.69) for all unpiped sources, compared to in-home piped water. Comparing unchlorinated water to chlorinated water, we found over a two-fold increased GC risk (OR 2.37, 95% CI: 1.56–3.61). Conclusions: Unpiped and unchlorinated drinking water sources, particularly wells and surface water, were significantly associated with the risk of GC.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Eichelberger & Gwen Murphy & Arash Etemadi & Christian C Abnet & Farhad Islami & Ramin Shakeri & Reza Malekzadeh & Sanford M Dawsey, 2015. "Risk of Gastric Cancer by Water Source: Evidence from the Golestan Case-Control Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0128491
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128491
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128491&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0128491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0128491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.