IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0127240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recalibration and Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in Korean Incident Hemodialysis Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Jae Yoon Park
  • Myoung-Hee Kim
  • Seung Seok Han
  • Hyunjeong Cho
  • Ho Kim
  • Dong-Ryeol Ryu
  • Hyunwook Kim
  • Hajeong Lee
  • Jung Pyo Lee
  • Chun-Soo Lim
  • Kyoung Hoon Kim
  • Kwon Wook Joo
  • Yon Su Kim
  • Dong Ki Kim
  • Clinical Research Center for End Stage Renal Disease (CRC for ESRD) Investigators

Abstract

Background: Weights assigned to comorbidities to predict mortality may vary based on the type of index disease and advances in the management of comorbidities. We aimed to develop a modified Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in incident hemodialysis patients (mCCI-IHD), thereby improving risk stratification for mortality. Methods: Data on 24,738 Koreans who received their first hemodialysis treatment between 2005 and 2008 were obtained from the Korean Health Insurance dataset. The mCCI-IHD score were calculated by summing up the weights which were assigned to individual comorbidities according to their relative prognostic significance determined by multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. The modified index was validated in an independent nationwide prospective cohort (n=1,100). Results: The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that all comorbidities in the CCI except ulcers significantly predicted mortality. Thus, the mCCI-IHD included 14 comorbidities with re-assigned severity weights. In the validation cohort, both the CCI and the mCCI-IHD were correlated with mortality. However, the mCCI-IHD showed modest but significant increases in c statistics compared with the CCI at 6 months and 1 year. The analyses using continuous net reclassification improvement revealed that the mCCI-IHD improved net mortality risk reclassification by 24.6% (95% CI, 2.5-46.7; P=0.03), 26.2% (95% CI, 1.0-51.4; P=0.04) and 42.8% (95% CI, 4.9-80.8; P=0.03) with respect to the CCI at 6 months and 1 and 2 years, respectively. Conclusions: The mCCI-IHD facilitates better risk stratification for mortality in incident hemodialysis patients compared with the CCI, suggesting that it may be a preferred index for use in clinical practice and the statistical analysis of epidemiological studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae Yoon Park & Myoung-Hee Kim & Seung Seok Han & Hyunjeong Cho & Ho Kim & Dong-Ryeol Ryu & Hyunwook Kim & Hajeong Lee & Jung Pyo Lee & Chun-Soo Lim & Kyoung Hoon Kim & Kwon Wook Joo & Yon Su Kim & Do, 2015. "Recalibration and Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in Korean Incident Hemodialysis Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0127240
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127240
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127240&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0127240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ping-Hsun Wu & Yi-Ting Lin & Tzu-Chi Lee & Ming-Yen Lin & Mei-Chuan Kuo & Yi-Wen Chiu & Shang-Jyh Hwang & Hung-Chun Chen, 2013. "Predicting Mortality of Incident Dialysis Patients in Taiwan - A Longitudinal Population-Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-7, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0127240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.