IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0126619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between Polymorphisms in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene and Response to Chemotherapies in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Wang
  • Shan Ji
  • Zeneng Cheng

Abstract

Background: Some studies have investigated the effects of polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene on responsiveness to chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) and have shown inconclusive results. Methods: Eligible studies that assessed the associations between polymorphisms in the VEGF gene and response to chemotherapy in CRC were searched in the PubMed, Embase and Medline databases until November 2014. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the associations, using Review Manager software, version 5.3. Stratified analysis was also conducted. Results: In the overall analysis, a significant association with responsiveness to chemotherapy in CRC was identified in CC vs. CA of the VEGF -2578 C/A polymorphism (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.00-1.97, P = 0.05) and in CC+CT vs. TT of the VEGF -460 C/T polymorphism (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96, P = 0.02). In subgroup analysis, a significant association was found in excluding anti-angiogenic agent subgroup in three comparison models of the VEGF -2578 C/A polymorphism and another three genetic models of the VEGF -460 C/T C/A polymorphism. Conclusions: CC vs. CA of the VEGF -2578 C/A polymorphism and CC+CT vs. TT of the VEGF -460 C/T polymorphism might be predictive factors of responsiveness to chemotherapy in CRC. However, single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the VEGF gene lacked sufficient predictive ability to determine whether patients with CRC should add anti-angiogenic agents to their chemotherapy regimens.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Wang & Shan Ji & Zeneng Cheng, 2015. "Association between Polymorphisms in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene and Response to Chemotherapies in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126619
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126619
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126619&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0126619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.